Originally posted by GlenW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Flounce central
Collapse
X
-
Looks like I was wrong, I'm shocked.I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens] -
He's been lurking all morning as his ban is up sometime today. I am expecting a major flounce after he comes back and posts in this special placeholder thread about what a c**t NAT is for banning all his unfunny sockies.Originally posted by GlenW View PostThis can't be right, Suity said he was leaving for good and he wouldn't tell fibs would he?
Suity is to sockies, as Lt Haulk is to a DJ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge6QPJfrGcYWhat happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Do you really think he is low enough to return after posting this?Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostHe's been lurking all morning as his ban is up sometime today. I am expecting a major flounce after he comes back and posts in this special placeholder thread about what a c**t NAT is for banning all his unfunny sockies.
Suity is to sockies, as Lt Haulk is to a DJ.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge6QPJfrGcYI'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]Comment
-
Join Date 20th January 2009
Last Activity Today 12:15
That is just pathetically bad....merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostJoin Date 20th January 2009
Last Activity Today 12:15
That is just pathetically bad....
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
I like your lingo, young fella me lad. and I likes the cut of yer jibOriginally posted by sockiefindergeneral View PostThe poster to whom you refer hath a good pedigree herein these fora.
I would that the hammer of ban fell upon thee rather, yet to my chagrin I must accept the law is above my capabilities.
now come and sit on me knee, and we'll talk about the first thing that comes up(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment