Why I cannot post?

[EternalOptimist]

Cannot understand why someone else can tag my thread with whatever they like. If the tags are inappropriate, would there be any repercussions to that person?

yes. the mods will go round to his house with a bazooka

[TheFaQQer]

Cannot understand why someone else can tag my thread with whatever they like. If the tags are inappropriate, would there be any repercussions to that person?

The only person who can see who left the tags (I think) is administrator.

You're best off sending him a PM to address your concerns about how the site is run.

[DiscoStu]

The only person who can see who left the tags (I think) is administrator.

You're best off sending him a solicitors letter to address your concerns about how the site is run.

FTFY

[MarillionFan]

Cannot understand why someone else can tag my thread with whatever they like. If the tags are inappropriate, would there be any repercussions to that person?

Sorry Frank that you've been targeted by the forum bullies and the TPD clique. They sort of run stuff around here. Passive aggressors the lot of 'em.

[NotAllThere]

yes. the mods will go round to his house with a bazooka

Duly bazooked. Such tags are not permitted in the professional forums. Of course,in General - well, you were warned...

Sorry Frank that you've been targeted by the forum bullies and the TPD clique. They sort of run stuff around here. Passive aggressors the lot of 'em.

[Bunk]

Sorry Frank that you've been targeted by the forum bullies and the TPD clique. They sort of run stuff around here. Passive aggressors the lot of 'em.

And don't you forget it

[Frank Big Bird]

So NAT has swiftly dealt with the inappropriate tags and kept his decision to block any new posts. Though there are still issues about 'negligence' and 'negotiate in bad faith' on the part of Morgan McKinley that I wanted to talk about that may warrant a legal case, I respect that NAT has the right to make such decision.

When the Advertising Standards Authority and/or Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate come back with some answers I shall make new posts here.

To fight or not to fight, it's your choice and it's your life.

[eek]

So NAT has swiftly dealt with the inappropriate tags and kept his decision to block any new posts. Though there are still issues about 'negligence' and 'negotiate in bad faith' on the part of Morgan McKinley that I wanted to talk about that may warrant a legal case, I respect that NAT has the right to make such decision.

When the Advertising Standards Authority and/or Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate come back with some answers I shall make new posts here.

To fight or not to fight, it's your choice and it's your life.

Yep it's your life. And by the looks of it you are wasting weeks of it fighting a pointless worthless battle...

[EternalOptimist]

To fight or not to fight, it's your choice and it's your life.

that's one heck of a responsibility you just heaped on me.

[tractor]

So NAT has swiftly dealt with the inappropriate tags and kept his decision to block any new posts. Though there are still issues about 'negligence' and 'negotiate in bad faith' on the part of Morgan McKinley that I wanted to talk about that may warrant a legal case, I respect that NAT has the right to make such decision.

When the Advertising Standards Authority and/or Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate come back with some answers I shall make new posts here.

To fight or not to fight, it's your choice and it's your life.

Your posts are not blocked. The thread is closed because 'it had run its course'

You are quite at liberty to create a new thread but you would be well advised not to create it in General but to create it in a more appropriate forum. Please don't ask for advice though because it seems you are incapable of taking any on board and, I am gusssing, any new thread you start in that vein is likely to be closed at some point for the same reason.