- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Article 127
Collapse
X
-
-
A127 is old news (the Independent has been banging on about A127 since July 2016), and the legal situation appears tilted towards it not being required. However, FWIW, I think they should put it to a vote. It's basically a vote for continued free movement (or not), and the outcome should be similar to the recent votes on the Withdrawal Bill.Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post -
A bit of fun isn't it? There is no referendum based mandate for this of course. The Leave campaign was clear that the UK would stay in the single market.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostA127 is old news (the Independent has been banging on about A127 since July 2016), and the legal situation appears tilted towards it not being required. However, FWIW, I think they should put it to a vote. It's basically a vote for continued free movement (or not), and the outcome should be similar to the recent votes on the Withdrawal Bill.Comment
-
There is a European free trade zone from Iceland to the Russian border and we will be part of it.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostA bit of fun isn't it? There is no referendum based mandate for this of course. The Leave campaign was clear that the UK would stay in the single market.
'Leave' looks like...Comment
-
Yes, clear that we wouldn't stay in the SM.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostA bit of fun isn't it? There is no referendum based mandate for this of course. The Leave campaign was clear that the UK would stay in the single market.
Fighting this would be a complete waste of taxpayers' money, much like A50. Although the earlier A127 case was rejected, it was on the grounds of the case being premature, and there has to be a realistic prospect of HMG losing a timely case (esp. with Jeremy Wright as AG).Comment
-
Comment
-
Where was this clearly said?Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostYes, clear that we wouldn't stay in the SM.Comment
-
How was this not clear?Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWhere was this clearly said?Comment
-
-
It was clearly said in the letter that Cameron who was the Prime Minister of the UK at the time sent to every voter at great expense. I voted Leave, I was and am quite clear that leaving the single market and ending free movement in its present form were part of the deal. I do wonder what country you were in? Using weasel words like the Leave campaign said this or that about the single market is pretty irrelevant and dare I say utterly childish.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWhere was this clearly said?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment