• Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Meliana's Thinking

Owlhoot - you will have noticed the removal of your point about an historical record-breaking hot year globally and a response to your weather point. Thus disqualifying the poster from the title 'sceptic'.

I see this a lot.

CgF92pyW8AErxp8.jpg

Ever considered 1951 - 1981 was an anomaly?
 
Owlhoot - you will have noticed the removal of your point about an historical record-breaking hot year globally and a response to your weather point.

Thus disqualifying the poster from the title 'sceptic'. ...

In fairness, the quote facility automatically strips quotes, although that was no doubt a welcome side effect here.

And yes, there are other less flattering words to describe people who willfully and obstinately ignore cast iron evidence!
 
Back on topic

Back on topic

How dare people attempt to derail my thread onto the dreary topic of AGW.

[…] the scandal raises an obvious question about the straight-shooting honesty of Mr Trump’s campaign that is one of his main boasts. Plainly, Mrs Trump was trying to reinforce just that impression by claiming, falsely, to have written the speech herself. She now looks a phony, which makes Mr Trump look like a phony, too.
He would now seem to have two ways of dealing with the fallout. He could admit the error and fire the errant speechwriter. Or Mr Trump, who almost never admits to possessing any weakness, may choose to ignore the blunder and simply blame the media for making an unnecessary fuss. His spokesman, in a statement released shortly after the foul-up was noticed, suggested Mr Trump preferred the second path.
[…]
“Maybe [this is] the funniest **** up in the history of political conventions,” tweeted the conservative commentator David Frum. It really was.

The Economist.
 

Advertisers

Back
Top