West 28th Street Limited

[CapnSeadog]

Requesting an SAR via ICO took no more than 10 mins. Well worth as ICO will now manage the process and update me along the way.
I requested all emails between W28 & Treths, and all emails between W28 & Ethica and all emails between Ethica & Treth that contain my name/details for a period 01/01/26 and 30/09/26

 

[CapnSeadog]

That will keep those idiots very busy. Even more busy if more people request SARs as they are very time consuming to respond to.

 

[CapnSeadog]

ICO's link - Make a subject access request

 

[MrO666]

I was only saying people be careful, as unless there's cast iron proof of something, then naming and shaming people on a public forum could land you in trouble. I would imagine that some of these people would have no issue in bringing a defamation case if they felt they had even the smallest of claims.

Each to their own, I'm just putting it out there, that's all.

 

[PixelPulse]

Will do the same. Trethowans denied the SARs due to them implying it's targeted and a massive campaign. Well so are their demand letters they sent us. I will point ICO to the FCA articles and articles on this site and the Trust Pilot review pages...and I will happily name anyone involved from Trethowans that are responsible for denying the SAR

What do they expect if they sent out thousands of demand, notice of default and now letter of claim. I would have thought pointing this out and dismissing as a justified Trethowans denied the SARs due to them implying it's targeted and a massive campaign. All individuals have the right to request this information. You are not responsible for their actions and generally were not prepared for general inquiries as a result. Given that GDPR is well known and a lot of persons involved in their action are IT people!!! WHAT WHERE THEY EXPECTING.

 

[mcinta]

I've been reviewing some historical correspondence relating to these arrangements, and it's interesting to reflect on how certain aspects were communicated at the time compared with the position being presented today.

During that review, I've come across some information which I believe may be relevant and warrants further consideration. I won't be sharing the details publicly, as I think it's important that anything potentially significant is properly assessed first.

I'll be passing the correspondence directly to my solicitor for independent review and advice, lets say its gold!

I'd encourage others to retain and carefully review any historical correspondence they may have, as the original communications could be relevant to their individual circumstances.

I'm not suggesting that any particular legal conclusion can be drawn from this, and I certainly wouldn't want to speculate publicly while matters remain ongoing.

Just thought it was worth mentioning, and I'll leave it there for now.

 

[terrythomas]

West 28th Street Limited — the numbers from their own filed accounts

West 28th Street Limited (company number 13231491) files accounts at Companies House, and anyone can download them for free. These are the figures from the most recent set — year ended 31 March 2026. Nothing added; just the record:

• Net liabilities: £1,110,968 (previous year: £16,416)
• Cash at bank: £22,020
• Creditors due within one year: £4,101,378 — of which “other loans”: £4,095,380
• Paid to a shareholder (Limelight Solutions Limited) during the year: £459,992
• Ownership: 50/50, Limelight Solutions Limited and West 13th Street Limited
• Employees: 1
• Acquired debts carried as “Stocks” (inventory): £2,597,548, at cost, “impaired as a portfolio”
• Revenue recognised “in the period in which the claim is realised”
• Accounts unaudited; prepared on a going-concern basis

Digging a little into West 13th that own half of West 28th.

There is a single active director: WEST 13TH LIMITED people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK

Googling that person could lead you to litigation funders Heirloom Fair Legal: Heirloom Fair Legal - Delivering Access to Justice

Going to TrustPilot for Heirloom Fair Legal (they must have changed names as the URL is odd): https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.hayesconnor.co.uk
Note the sheer number of reviews alleging fraudulent use of signatures/forging of documents.

Just saying, nothing implied. E&OE etc etc

 

[eek]

Digging a little into West 13th that own half of West 28th.

There is a single active director: WEST 13TH LIMITED people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK

Googling that person could lead you to litigation funders Heirloom Fair Legal: Heirloom Fair Legal - Delivering Access to Justice

Going to TrustPilot for Heirloom Fair Legal (they must have changed names as the URL is odd): https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/www.hayesconnor.co.uk
Note the sheer number of reviews alleging fraudulent use of signatures/forging of documents.

Just saying, nothing implied. E&OE etc etc

Why do you think I'm telling people to send signatures that aren't their real signature...

 

[mikcyp20]

Also original emails are like signatures.
Use different if you choose to correspond via email.

 

[cojak]

Don't see why names can't be shared here? It's a public forum

Because it opens the forum up to defamation claims. And because I will ban people who try it multiple times.

I do hope I’ve made myself clear.