-
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Recent content by Retro
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
Sorry BP, I couldn't believe they were newbies and just starting to get interested in the case, but perhaps some people are better than me at ignoring things they might not like.- Retro
- Post #135
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
Yes, they've actually had 14 years to ask questions, so they're not newbies, just people who want a different identity.- Retro
- Post #132
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
Thank you very much indeed for the info.- Retro
- Post #78
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
So, if I can't afford to pay the penalties and if I decide to pay HMRC the full tax and interest, would I still be liable to pay MP if they subsequently win the case? (14 years and counting!).- Retro
- Post #73
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
That's OK provided MP don't land us with penalties to go along with tax and interest.- Retro
- Post #70
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
At least we can be assured that Montpelier will keep us right up to date with the possible outcomes. Yes, I'm taking the ....- Retro
- Post #45
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
Montpelier DTA scheme bulletin
I read on another thread about the possibility of retrospective penalties. HMRC can now change tax rules retrospectively, but can they do this with penalties as well? Would trying to settle now (I've tried for a decade without success) be utter madness or a prudent move?- Retro
- Post #8
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Sorry. This is obviously a different scheme. Please ignore me.- Retro
- Post #2,325
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Is it not the case that the loans are only repayable if there are no further tax liabilities for each year?- Retro
- Post #2,323
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
The loan agreement is quite clear. Rest of message deleted in case it is confidential.- Retro
- Post #2,321
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
CTD to payment on account? CTD to payment on account? I bought a CTD back in 2008 and I haven't had to use it to pay an APN. Is there any advantage to me to convert the CTD to a payment on account or does it just mean it will be more difficult to get the money back when we win?- Retro
- Post #2,307
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
An early Happy New Year to everybody at HMRC. May you enjoy another 12 year period of inactivity in the run up to your retirements. At least that's the time period of which I'm aware.- Retro
- Post #2,295
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Thanks DR.- Retro
- Post #2,292
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Do we know if MP went ahead with the appeal to the Upper Tribunal?- Retro
- Post #2,290
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
R
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Is that the very end of the line or is George still afloat?- Retro
- Post #2,283
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
