Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Yes indeed. I have a contract with brolly, further contract exists between brolly and agency (which I have seen, no restrictive clause in it). The contract between agency and client co. I have never seen personally, as you would expect.
The agency have no hold over me personally, but if I...
Thank you both. What I'd like to do is approach the client with the output from a solicitor backing up the notion that the agency has no case, I am hoping this will assure them enough to let me change position and deal with the agency if and when they try their luck. Are there any particular...
Hello everyone, would appreciate some advice. Inside-IR35 contractor via brolly then agency to client co., been there a few years. I have been offered work in a different business unit, work which is not able to be done via the current chain of brolly/agency as the new area of the business...
Everything of mine is/was pre-2010, so initially this sounded like reasonable and exciting news. But:
2.12 While loans made before 9 December 2010 are removed from the scope of the Loan Charge, the underlying tax liability for loans made prior to this date remains. HMRC will continue to pursue...
Hello. I am currently working outside with a client and it looks like an assessment as inside is en route, with an extension offer currently on the table. I think I will have the option of staying with the client for some time and am at a stage in life when maximising take-home is not top...
"He has said that where loans etc have been fully disclosed and/or years closed, then the loan charge will not apply."
....I wonder what 'fully disclosed' means. Reported every year on P11D and part of a DOTAS-registered scheme - that 'full' enough, I wonder?
So, this from parliament.uk:
"Tax avoidance is to be distinguished from tax evasion, where someone acts against the law."
Has anyone as yet challenged Stride on why he repeatedly states otherwise?
But "of course HRMC's door is always open to discussion with those individuals in that situation".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRV1BT1zfzg
Can smell his words from here.