-
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Recent content by Fireship
-
F
EBT Loan Write Down: Premium Resolutions
Thanks for the feedback. I have a couple of questions so I'll PM you.- Fireship
- Post #6
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
EBT Loan Write Down: Premium Resolutions
I understand they are associated with (or part of) the "Dark Blue" companies as the people I know have all been referred to them by Dark Blue....- Fireship
- Post #3
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
EBT Loan Write Down: Premium Resolutions
Anyone heard of Premium Resolutions?? A couple of people I know have been passed in their direction to write down existing loans ahead of the planned changes to legislation this April. As far as I know they are associated with another provider that's been around for some years. I was wondering...- Fireship
- Thread
- Replies: 8
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
Montpelier & Newquay 10% loan repayment demands
HMRC are certainly questioning the 'legitimacy' of the loans hence the open enquiries. Their argument is that they were never intended to be repaid (despite the loan agreement making provisions for repayment) hence were never real 'loans'. I'm not going to speculate what certain promoters may...- Fireship
- Post #196
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
Montpelier & Newquay 10% loan repayment demands
Correct, such a legal opinion exists, in fact I believe there are similar opinions from other barristers (unrelated to MP) which state the same. However, one much first be able to demonstrate any loans are legitimate for that to be the case - one could also argue that (where any doubt exists)...- Fireship
- Post #193
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
Montpelier & Newquay 10% loan repayment demands
Sorry, I'm lost, isn't that the ruling relating to costs for the case brought against the liquidator for damages due to a claimed sale at an undervalue? The holding company went into administration almost 2 years ago, in the end the liquidator sold the vessel to one of the other creditors which...- Fireship
- Post #108
- Forum: HMRC Scheme Enquiries
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Correct, my mistake, missed the part about CTD when I read the original post. Assuming you have enough in a squirreled away in a CTD you can use that to settle the APN.- Fireship
- Post #2,117
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Nope, any representation to the FtTT to be a long drawn out affair nor will it delay payment of an APN. For APN payment to be stood over we need MontP to submit a JR prior to the due date.- Fireship
- Post #2,112
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
I agree, they should be held to account and I'd be happy to fund any such legal action. However I understand others may feel differently….- Fireship
- Post #2,008
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Everyone I know received all APN’s in a single communication, if it wasn’t in the same envelope I’d say it’s safe to assume one hasn’t been issued and it’s better left well alone!! Any mistake on HMRC’s part may ultimately play into your hands with the passage of time so don’t screw yourself...- Fireship
- Post #1,955
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
I would suggest, fair or otherwise, it’s because HMRC ultimately want to get their hands on the cash and don’t care about collateral damage!! They want the cash so they follow the money trail. There’s no point targeting a company which has little/no value and/or may not even exist any longer...- Fireship
- Post #1,954
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Anything to lose by taking to twitter to increase visibility and signups?? I’m guessing a large portion of the 1700 aren’t aware of what’s going on here for one reason or another….- Fireship
- Post #1,840
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Maybe it would be possible to email the documents direct to John to speed up the process and so we know they've arrived?- Fireship
- Post #1,731
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Wouldn't that be fraud...... (Hector would be well advised to check CPS policy and guidence before going down this route.)- Fireship
- Post #1,683
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
-
F
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
That's great news :happy- Fireship
- Post #1,682
- Forum: Accounting / Legal
