-
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Recent content by Finance
-
F
Dust settles - what happened?
Paid on time and outside IR35 as assessed. All OK.- Finance
- Post #52
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS Reaches 'Agreement' that IR35 Changes 'aren't retrospective'
There was a steady stream of anti contractor articles in the media in the run up to the introduction of the new IR 35 rules. Presumably influenced by HMRC?- Finance
- Post #12
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS Reaches 'Agreement' that IR35 Changes 'aren't retrospective'
Its a rubbish number and propaganda worthy or Goebbels. Does not include the corporation tax you would pay. Though for that matter they also miss out the ni on the permanent salary.- Finance
- Post #10
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
Same Role, classed inside for one PS and outside for another
Its pretty much up to the discretion of the PS to decide in or out. Some PS managers are less risk adverse than others.- Finance
- Post #3
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
HMRC decision tool: doubts about the selected answers, results, implications, ...
How are they able to change the tool anyway? I thought all their IT contractors had left, or did some quislings stay?- Finance
- Post #62
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
HMRC decision tool: doubts about the selected answers, results, implications, ...
Don't think I will mention the changes to my client.. no need to worry them unnecessarily.- Finance
- Post #49
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
HMRC decision tool: doubts about the selected answers, results, implications, ...
The changes make it harde to get outside. If you don't have substitution you are going to now have to both have to pay your expenses and use your own vehicle to get out.- Finance
- Post #47
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
Retrospection
The report says that 95% of the government including the NHS were operating the then rules correctly, which implies most of those ruled in should be out.- Finance
- Post #2
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
In the past there have been numerous contractors in posts that are clearly officers - voting board members such as cfo and CEO - at NHS trusts who were outside ir35 and on big rates. The sort that get into the daily mal. All changed now though. Temporary board posts are now sourced from big 4...- Finance
- Post #29
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
Yes. In practice in an NHS organisation the voting board members as I said. Vast majority of contractors are not on the board so are not officers.- Finance
- Post #26
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
Financial risk has long been established in case law as being inconsistent with employment. It is why the tool (and its predecessor) has the question on expenses. You have seen the tool?- Finance
- Post #19
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
I know exactly what an 'officer' for the purposes of IR35 is. Not everyone whose job title includes 'director' is a Director. One can have any made up job title one likes, it does not make one an Officer. Check the guidance. Having business expenses means that you are at risk of not...- Finance
- Post #15
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
An IT director post will not be an officer, will have a high degree of control over how they perform their role, may well have to pay their own expenses e.g. insurance, travel, training and could well have to fix any errors in their own time. Putting that into the tool will get you out every...- Finance
- Post #11
- Forum: IR35 Reform
-
F
NHS 'trying not to blink'
An IT director is very unlikely to be an 'officer'. In an NHS organisation the officers are going to be the voting board members (not usually the IT director) plus a handful of specific medical statutory posts. If the organisation is actively using the tool then an IT director could be ruled...- Finance
- Post #5
- Forum: IR35 Reform
