• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Umbrella - paying part of rate as expenses?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Umbrella - paying part of rate as expenses?

    In conversation with a company who have offered me a position. Thats the good news...

    But they are offering the rate in 4 flavoursthrough an umbrella, their nominated umbrella and i have to choose.

    Unfortunately 2 of the 4 options i just cant understand the legitimacy of what they are offering

    Regardless, the top line rate remains the same at £X.

    Option 1 is £X per hour at 40 hours per week
    Option 2 is £X per hour at 45 hours per week

    So far so good

    Option 3 is £Y rate and £Z expenses per hour (which together total £X)
    Option 4 is £A rate (A is less than Y) and £B expenses (B is more than Z) - which together total £X

    The illustrations show the take home for options 3 and 4 to be in excess of options 1 and 2, and something doesnt seem right. How can they pay you an 'expenses' hourly rate to increase your take home?

    Ive had a quick search and couldnt find anything obvious. Anyone else heard of this type of arrangement? and is it a legit way to pay?

    Cheers

    S

    #2
    What is the umbrella's name?

    As it's possible* for subsistence expenses to be available if you are not subject to supervision direction or control (and you need to be subject to none of them to qualify).

    * whether it's sane is a different matter - my opinion is that passing that test is harder than a lot of umbrellas claim.
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      #3
      Option 4. The expenses £B rate is 20% of £X

      its Azure..... I’d never heard of them...

      Comment


        #4
        Fixed rate expenses... Interesting thought, but they aren't expenses as far as HMRC are concerned 99% of the time. As a rule of thumb if you make money on expenses you're doing something wrong.

        I also don't understand the 40/45 hour option. Why??

        I would walk away rather quickly. YMMV of course.
        Blog? What blog...?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          Fixed rate expenses... Interesting thought, but they aren't expenses as far as HMRC are concerned 99% of the time. As a rule of thumb if you make money on expenses you're doing something wrong.

          I also don't understand the 40/45 hour option. Why??

          I would walk away rather quickly. YMMV of course.
          Advance offer such a scheme Umbrella company for contractors and temporary workers | ADVANCE - and it is based on a fixed amount per week because believe it or not that's the only thing HMRC rules allow. The scheme is really designed for CIS workers so you will find it more at umbrellas that focus on that market.

          As for Azure - it's "accredited by Professional Passport" but unless Crawford has improved his validation a lot I wouldn't trust it given that he passed Umbrellaworx and other dodgy as f*** firms in the past.
          merely at clientco for the entertainment

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by eek View Post

            Advance offer such a scheme Umbrella company for contractors and temporary workers | ADVANCE - and it is based on a fixed amount per week because believe it or not that's the only thing HMRC rules allow. The scheme is really designed for CIS workers so you will find it more at umbrellas that focus on that market.

            As for Azure - it's "accredited by Professional Passport" but unless Crawford has improved his validation a lot I wouldn't trust it given that he passed Umbrellaworx and other dodgy as f*** firms in the past.
            Ah, yes, forgot the CIS variations... But I agree about PP accreditation.
            Blog? What blog...?

            Comment

            Working...
            X