So HMRC have issued the Amendment to Clause 14: Travel expenses of workers providing services through intermediaries Not surprisingly they are going to apply this retrospectively from 6th April, so let's hope no-one has been caught by an umbrella company thinking it gave them an excuse to continue allowing expenses until they rewrote the mistake!
-
-
Only the contractor who sits next to me and didn't believe me. Given what he spends on expenses he's in for a shockOriginally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View Postmerely at clientco for the entertainment -
-
Is it just me that can't help but smile a little inside when I read these stories? I'm a very bad man.Originally posted by eek View Post'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
My viewpoint is I've warned him. Anything that happens afterwards isOriginally posted by northernladuk View Post
It's worse than that as the umbrella (who will remain nameless but a thesaurus will give you the answer) are still saying they are happy to pay expenses provided you confirm you are not under S D & C by getting the end client to sign this paperwork...Last edited by eek; 16 June 2016, 08:20.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Has the brolly not read the clause which transfers debt to the directors????? Or are they banking on the claim that the documents were fraudulent? If they were hedging their bets they woud have to have documentation from the contractor, the end client, the agency and the whole worldOriginally posted by eek View PostMy viewpoint is I've warned him. Anything that happens afterwards is
It's worse than that as the umbrella (who will remain nameless but a thesaurus will give you the answer) are still saying they are happy to pay expenses provided you confirm you are not under S D & C by getting the end client to sign this paperwork...
Comment
-
I know that, you know that. And there is paperwork he's been asked to get signed by everyone and their aunt.Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View PostHas the brolly not read the clause which transfers debt to the directors????? Or are they banking on the claim that the documents were fraudulent? If they were hedging their bets they woud have to have documentation from the contractor, the end client, the agency and the whole world
But as we all know it's a sham and I really cannot understand why any director would risk it but hey hoLast edited by eek; 16 June 2016, 08:58.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
Comment