Originally posted by hobnob
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Reply to: Umbrella offering expenses?!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Umbrella offering expenses?!"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostLooking for a new brolly now and noticed a lot of them are still saying "you might be able to get travelling expenses".
NB The mileage expenses were on top of my daily rate, i.e. this didn't reduce the amount of tax/NI that I paid.
I think that NLUK is correct: the umbrella has chosen their words carefully, to say something that is technically true, but potentially misleading.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lucyclarityumbrella View Post
So my conversation with HMRC back when IR35 came into the public sector was along these lines...
If inside IR35, likelihood is that the contractor would fail an SDC test (not that an official test actually exists), on a rare occasion that the end client would declare that the contractor is not under SDC, then the contractor "may" be able to claim these back via self assessment at the end of the year.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostYep - if the contract is outside IR35 and you are not subject to SDC and wish to use an umbrella then you could claim expenses.
If inside IR35, likelihood is that the contractor would fail an SDC test (not that an official test actually exists), on a rare occasion that the end client would declare that the contractor is not under SDC, then the contractor "may" be able to claim these back via self assessment at the end of the year.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
Yep - if the contract is outside IR35 and you are not subject to SDC and wish to use an umbrella then you could claim expenses.
However, the umbrellas that push expenses don't use the outside distinction and have a questionnaire that is surprisingly easy to pass given the hints they provide...
Sane umbrellas won't touch the idea with a barge-pole as HMRC investigations aren't fun and will result in a large cost even if you are 100% in the right.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
You might not but there are situations where an outside gig might be run through a brolly. People that can't set up a LTD, single engagement where LTD isn't worthwhile, someone that's MVL'd and can't use a LTD for the next two years etc.
I see Eek's comment and I am afraid to ask but I will. Isn't there certain situations linked to SDC where expenses 'might' be possible and all the umbrella are doing are using the possibility in rare circumstances as an excuse to be very liberal with their sales pitch? Is it not true a few people 'might' be able to claim it but it's misleading to use it in general documentation/sales pitches?
However, the umbrellas that push expenses don't use the outside distinction and have a questionnaire that is surprisingly easy to pass given the hints they provide...
Sane umbrellas won't touch the idea with a barge-pole as HMRC investigations aren't fun and will result in a large cost even if you are 100% in the right.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostLooking for a new brolly now and noticed a lot of them are still saying "you might be able to get travelling expenses".
Having been on an inside role for the last 4 years this is news to me....
But reading the above, if its deemed inside by the client then no expenses anyway. I don't get it - if it was outside I wouldnt be using a brolly in the first place!
I see Eek's comment and I am afraid to ask but I will. Isn't there certain situations linked to SDC where expenses 'might' be possible and all the umbrella are doing are using the possibility in rare circumstances as an excuse to be very liberal with their sales pitch? Is it not true a few people 'might' be able to claim it but it's misleading to use it in general documentation/sales pitches?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostLooking for a new brolly now and noticed a lot of them are still saying "you might be able to get travelling expenses".
Having been on an inside role for the last 4 years this is news to me....
But reading the above, if its deemed inside by the client then no expenses anyway. I don't get it - if it was outside I wouldnt be using a brolly in the first place!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostLooking for a new brolly now and noticed a lot of them are still saying "you might be able to get travelling expenses".
Having been on an inside role for the last 4 years this is news to me....
But reading the above, if its deemed inside by the client then no expenses anyway. I don't get it - if it was outside I wouldnt be using a brolly in the first place!
Leave a comment:
-
Looking for a new brolly now and noticed a lot of them are still saying "you might be able to get travelling expenses".
Having been on an inside role for the last 4 years this is news to me....
But reading the above, if its deemed inside by the client then no expenses anyway. I don't get it - if it was outside I wouldnt be using a brolly in the first place!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hobnob View PostI suspect that a similar thing will happen for iPhones etc.
And I think you mean just 'phones' and not iphones.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI'm not sure that a 3 month old iphone is worth just 15% of the original purchase price though
EIM21667A - Employment Income Manual - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
If the rental scheme lasted for a year, then the acceptable disposal value is 18% (for a bike that cost less than £500) or 25% (for a bike that cost £500 or more). That means the company either has to sell the bike for that much, or they can sell it for less and treat the saving as a BIK.
I suspect that a similar thing will happen for iPhones etc.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The top 10 umbrella company checklist for contractors Jun 24 09:00
- Exchequer Solutions Ltd director Mike Lowndes steps down from FCSA, following GBP11million unpaid tax ruling on contractor expenses Jun 23 08:41
- IR35 reviews and the MSC rules: 'Standardised Product' versus 'Tailored Advice.' What are the risks? Jun 23 08:05
- Peak PAYE Ltd 'named and shamed' by HMRC as a scheme promoter to avoid Jun 22 09:31
- How to close your company and extract the profits Jun 22 08:53
- Agency contractors, don't let your limited company become an afterthought Jun 21 08:59
- Contractors' Questions: Does forming a consultancy with other contractors beat IR35? Jun 21 08:17
- The pros and cons of using an umbrella company for contractors Jun 20 08:54
- Advisers to loan charge contractors urged to help MPs 'look under the carpet' Jun 20 08:50
- The Contracting Awards 2022 winners announced Jun 17 12:38
Leave a comment: