Originally posted by dang65
View Post
Climate Change (on either side of the mass debate), can be argued scientifically, or emotionally. The greens tend to do it emotionally, as they are "true believers". ACC really suits their belief system, so it is akin to a religious belief - proof is used to bolster their beliefs; lack of proof, or falsifiying proof is rejected.
Opponents to ACC may also be true believers - their mindset determined by hatred of greens.
Leave a comment: