- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: We All Live in a Nuclear Submarine ...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We All Live in a Nuclear Submarine ..."
Collapse
-
The most disappointing aspect of this incident, is that I heard a British Admiral pronouncing nuclear as "nucular."
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostHowever, one might have expected the French Navy to be well versed with underwater maneouvres as a great deal of their fleet has historically been berthed there!!
Leave a comment:
-
The problem you have is that both vessels were stocked with matelots. There are numerous recent examples of these muppets running aground on the surface FFS. Hardly surprising that they have now managed it beneath the waves.
However, one might have expected the French Navy to be well versed with underwater maneouvres as a great deal of their fleet has historically been berthed there!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostIf it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostAlthough I would have accepted the line that it was an exercise that went wrong, there is one thing that makes me doubt it. Would you use two subs of the same class i.e. ballistic missile? If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
Again, this is directly from Red October but the extra tenseness of an unscripted activity would both be good for training and more open for cock-ups.Last edited by d000hg; 16 February 2009, 16:42.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postyeah, good idea. what was it called ? seaview or something. Voyage to the bottom of the sea, Richard Baseheart.
With the windows though, you'd have to make sure the view isn't obscured by the old tyres hanging down from the deck. The length of rope could be a critical bit of design.
Do you think they should fit indicators too? Those ones that flip out sideways like on the old morris minors.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostBut THAT frogman wasn't looking where he was going. Too busy lighting up a Gitaine I shouldn't wonder.
Why don't submarines have windows all along the sides like they do in cartoons?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostYou can't be serious. Dont you relise that it was crashing INTO a frogman that caused all the fuss in the first place
Why don't submarines have windows all along the sides like they do in cartoons?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostGood idea. I'd also reintroduce crow's nests. They always used to spot each other in those days. Obviously being a submarine the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostThey should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral
Leave a comment:
-
They should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral
Leave a comment:
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7892294.stm
Nothing like the words "Nuclear" and "Collision" to bring over-reaction and hyperbole to the BBC.
Leave a comment:
-
Although I would have accepted the line that it was an exercise that went wrong, there is one thing that makes me doubt it. Would you use two subs of the same class i.e. ballistic missile? If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: