• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "We All Live in a Nuclear Submarine ..."

Collapse

  • IR35 Avoider
    replied
    The most disappointing aspect of this incident, is that I heard a British Admiral pronouncing nuclear as "nucular."

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    However, one might have expected the French Navy to be well versed with underwater maneouvres as a great deal of their fleet has historically been berthed there!!

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    The problem you have is that both vessels were stocked with matelots. There are numerous recent examples of these muppets running aground on the surface FFS. Hardly surprising that they have now managed it beneath the waves.
    However, one might have expected the French Navy to be well versed with underwater maneouvres as a great deal of their fleet has historically been berthed there!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
    Not necessarily, both classes of boat (missile & fleet) have similar sonar types and the skills required in both sets are similar (hide quietly or hunt quietly).

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Although I would have accepted the line that it was an exercise that went wrong, there is one thing that makes me doubt it. Would you use two subs of the same class i.e. ballistic missile? If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?
    I was actually thinking an unofficial exercise. e.g one sub spots the other and decides to try and get as close as possible without being detected and they end up chasing each other around.

    Again, this is directly from Red October but the extra tenseness of an unscripted activity would both be good for training and more open for cock-ups.
    Last edited by d000hg; 16 February 2009, 16:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    yeah, good idea. what was it called ? seaview or something. Voyage to the bottom of the sea, Richard Baseheart.
    (Yes. Sorry, it wasn't a cartoon it was real life. Wasn't that bloke with the black hair and dark, dark eyebrows in it as well?)

    With the windows though, you'd have to make sure the view isn't obscured by the old tyres hanging down from the deck. The length of rope could be a critical bit of design.

    Do you think they should fit indicators too? Those ones that flip out sideways like on the old morris minors.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    But THAT frogman wasn't looking where he was going. Too busy lighting up a Gitaine I shouldn't wonder.

    Why don't submarines have windows all along the sides like they do in cartoons?
    yeah, good idea. what was it called ? seaview or something. Voyage to the bottom of the sea, Richard Baseheart.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    You can't be serious. Dont you relise that it was crashing INTO a frogman that caused all the fuss in the first place
    But THAT frogman wasn't looking where he was going. Too busy lighting up a Gitaine I shouldn't wonder.

    Why don't submarines have windows all along the sides like they do in cartoons?

    Leave a comment:


  • jmo21
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Most of what he writes is well researched.

    Most of mine comes from a stint in a now defunct government agency but it's fascinating stuff.
    CTU?!

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Good idea. I'd also reintroduce crow's nests. They always used to spot each other in those days. Obviously being a submarine the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.
    You can't be serious. Dont you relise that it was crashing INTO a frogman that caused all the fuss in the first place




    Leave a comment:


  • Drewster
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.
    I am not sure we want to share in your fanasies!

    Although thinking about it..........

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    They should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral
    Good idea. I'd also reintroduce crow's nests. They always used to spot each other in those days. Obviously being a submarine the man in it would have to be dressed up as a frogman.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    They should hang old tractor tyres off the sides, tied on with old rope, so they sort of bounce off each other. Thats what I would do if I was an admiral






    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7892294.stm

    Nothing like the words "Nuclear" and "Collision" to bring over-reaction and hyperbole to the BBC.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Although I would have accepted the line that it was an exercise that went wrong, there is one thing that makes me doubt it. Would you use two subs of the same class i.e. ballistic missile? If it was a hide/seek exercise, a very valid thing to do, surely it would be of two different classes?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X