Originally posted by DiscoStu
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Siege lawyer hit at least five times..
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Siege lawyer hit at least five times.."
Collapse
-
Or a table leg in a carrier bag.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostWHS
Sad for his family but as soon as you start waving a gun (or even a replica)
Leave a comment:
-
Unless they're the thieving bar-steward type that'll spend a day doing something they could do in an hour. In that case I think it's perfectly reasonable.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostWHS
Sad for his family but as soon as you start waving a gun (or even a replica) at the Police, you can expect to be shot dead. I feel sorry for the coppers, actually
BTW I don't feel the cops have the right to shoot unarmed electricians.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
WHSOriginally posted by DimPrawn View PostOne less lawyer is not a bad thing.
Sad for his family but as soon as you start waving a gun (or even a replica) at the Police, you can expect to be shot dead. I feel sorry for the coppers, actually
BTW I don't feel the cops have the right to shoot unarmed electricians.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Don't be so bloody silly. An injured man's still able to shoot people. If he's presenting mortal danger to other people (which he clearly was), then the priority of the police should be to protect Joe Public, which they did very effectively.Originally posted by oloks View PostThey are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him. The guy is sick he needed help, he is not an animal
Leave a comment:
-
All my mates who served in iraq used to use the motto: Its better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.Originally posted by oloks View PostThey are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him. The guy is sick he needed help, he is not an animal
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah my understanding was that pulling the trigger indicates that the intent of the officer is to kill.
There's never any "shoot to wound" poncing around.
If the trigger's pulled a kill should occur...you should only really moan if they fire off a live round and no-one is killed as that's quite clearly a mistake.
Leave a comment:
-
He is beyond sick now.Originally posted by oloks View PostThey are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him. The guy is sick he needed help, he is not an animal
IF he hadn't started shooting, IF he had put the gun down he may well be alive now. Only himself to blame, why should some innocent passer by suffer because he is sick and he has a gun.
Leave a comment:
-
But that is not their training. Blame the training, not the shooters if you want to get on a horse about something.Originally posted by oloks View PostThey are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him. The guy is sick he needed help, he is not an animal
Leave a comment:
-
They are NOT trained to disable, they are trained to kill. Don't like it, get elected, work your way up to senior office and get the law changed.Originally posted by boloks View PostThey are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him...
Leave a comment:
-
if i was one of the cops, i'd rather know my mucker was aiming to kill the guy just in case my bullet didnt do the job.
Shoot him in the leg or the arm, yes he'll be floored, but he could shoot at me.
wake up lad, own safety first!
Leave a comment:
-
They are trained shooters, they can achieve disabling him rather than killing him. The guy is sick he needed help, he is not an animalOriginally posted by scooby View Postdisagree. first line should always be to remove any danger.
if the person is breathing and moving, they can fire. this is the reason most special ops use the 'double tap' 1 to kill them, the second to kill them again.
Leave a comment:
-
They'd have killed him even more times if he was wearing a rucksack...Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostI shouldn't think it was overkill. More likely there were five weapons pointed at him as he raised his weapon to shoot and each officer fired once.
If you're about to be shot at, you shoot to kill. This is, has always been and will always be, police policy. One very dead gunman is better than one dead copper.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: