• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Writer Arthur C Clarke dies at 90"

Collapse

  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    Didn't know that - if it's true I take it all back
    Michael Jackson was 'innocent' too

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
    His "K" was delayed while they investigated him about his "proclivities". He finally got his "K" when he was exonerated.
    Didn't know that - if it's true I take it all back

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Marina View Post
    What's wrong with teaching young boys to play with their instruments?

    I wish I'd stuck at the piano when I was that age, but learning to fiddle would have been even better.

    Something tells me you've taught a few young men how to trombone

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    Originally posted by Marina View Post
    They couldn't have been _that_ unsavoury, by today's standards, or surely he wouldn't have got his K ? I mean they do background checks to ensure recipients of honours don't turn out have some frightful skeleton in the cupboard (although "Sir" Antony Blunt slipped through the net evidently)
    His "K" was delayed while they investigated him about his "proclivities". He finally got his "K" when he was exonerated.


    I didn't bother looking at the rest of the "Rama" books as I thought the first one was not up to standard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I thought he liked to fiddle with young boys?
    What's wrong with teaching young boys to play with their instruments?

    I wish I'd stuck at the piano when I was that age, but learning to fiddle would have been even better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    I thought he liked to fiddle with young boys?

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
    I had a lot of respect for him until the more unsavoury aspects of his sexual preferences came out.
    They couldn't have been _that_ unsavoury, by today's standards, or surely he wouldn't have got his K ? I mean they do background checks to ensure recipients of honours don't turn out have some frightful skeleton in the cupboard (although "Sir" Antony Blunt slipped through the net evidently)

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    Who is Rama ? Was he one of the servant boys too ?
    Enjoyable books imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • moorfield
    replied
    Who is Rama ? Was he one of the servant boys too ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by Marina View Post
    It does leave a lot "up in the air", which some people may find dissatisfying. For example, you never meet any aliens (not the ones who built the ship anyway). But then the whole thing is _meant_ to be mysterious and unfathomable, which is probably how something like that would be in real life.

    The sequels ("Return to Rama" I think one was called ?) wasn't as good, but then if memory serves Clarke co-authored those with Lee Gentry, which IMHO tended to make the plots turn to mush (although whether it's fair to blame Gentry for that, and not Clarke's advancing years or just having two authors, is hard to say).
    The last one is called “Rama revealed”. It’s been on my bookshelf for about 6 years now, I enjoyed rendezvous a lot but found the second one quite hard work. I had a lot of respect for him until the more unsavoury aspects of his sexual preferences came out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    Originally posted by KathyWoolfe View Post
    I didn't think the book was all that good, but then it's been years since I read it.
    It does leave a lot "up in the air", which some people may find dissatisfying. For example, you never meet any aliens (not the ones who built the ship anyway). But then the whole thing is _meant_ to be mysterious and unfathomable, which is probably how something like that would be in real life.

    The sequels ("Return to Rama" I think one was called ?) wasn't as good, but then if memory serves Clarke co-authored those with Lee Gentry, which IMHO tended to make the plots turn to mush (although whether it's fair to blame Gentry for that, and not Clarke's advancing years or just having two authors, is hard to say).

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    Originally posted by Marina View Post
    What a bummer. (and I mean the situation, Churchill!) Now Clarke will miss the film of his book "Rendezvous with Rama". Filming is apparently complete, but there's still a shed load of special effects to edit and the film isn't due out until early next year. Should be a real cracker, unless the Yanks completely cock it up and sentimentalize the whole thing.

    I didn't think the book was all that good, but then it's been years since I read it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    What a bummer. (and I mean the situation, Churchill!) Now Clarke will miss the film of his book "Rendezvous with Rama". Filming is apparently complete, but there's still a shed load of special effects to edit and the film isn't due out until early next year. Should be a real cracker, unless the Yanks completely cock it up and sentimentalize the whole thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Ah well.

    At least the little Sri-Lankan Servant Boys are safe now.
    At 90 I think they must have been pretty safe anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Ah well.

    At least the little Sri-Lankan Servant Boys are safe now.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X