Well at least the luvvies are getting some stress

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

SueEllen replied

21 November 2016, 15:28
The article is so wrong it would be funny if it wasn't so annoying.
Leave a comment:
vetran started a topic Well at least the luvvies are getting some stress

21 November 2016, 11:09
Well at least the luvvies are getting some stress

Tess Daly winds up production company and walks away with a cool £2.2million | Daily Mail Online

Explaining the tax benefits of earning through a personal service company, Mr Sanger added: ‘There will be corporation tax at 20 per cent on earnings within the company and then there will be capital gains tax when it comes to liquidation.

‘But ultimately the amount that a person is taxed through a personal service company will be less than if they were a direct employee. The personal service company doesn’t have to pay national insurance and neither does the employer so they can pass on the saving to the company.’

ah great they are still going on about fantasy tax.
Tags: None