Reply to: Forced oral sex isn't a crime if the victim is unconscious rules Oklahoma court

[cojak]

Again, I'm finding this offensive and am locking the thread.

[MrMarkyMark]

Oh yeah, and you can always tell them that it's good for their complexion...

That's a dead cert, also helps if you can offer decent "coverage ".

[Unix]

If you are like me, you might be the cause of the obstruction down their throat.

I hear you, ditto bro.

[WTFH]

Or they were choking and you where clearing their throat of obstructions.

If you are like me, you might be the cause of the obstruction down their throat.

[Unix]

Oh yeah, and you can always tell them that it's good for their complexion...

Or they were choking and you where clearing their throat of obstructions.

[WTFH]

Oh yeah, and you can always tell them that it's good for their complexion...

[WTFH]

They can't give but can receive.

"It is better to give than to receive"

[Unix]

Im not sure but can an unconscious person give head??

They can't give but can receive.

[BrilloPad]

Im not sure but can an unconscious person give head??

Unconscious pigs can. Ask DC.

[original PM]

A stupid law and a stupid interpretation thereof: apparently it hinges on a technicality, in that though state law does classify sexual activity with a drunk unconscious victim as rape, it only mentions vaginal and anal penetration, not oral.

I read that even the defence lawyer has said that the authorities were stupid to use the charge they did, as there was another possible charge under different sexual assault legislation, for which their client would almost certainly have been convicted.

Im not sure but can an unconscious person give head??

[stek]

I'm just waiting for Michelle Keegan to fall asleep......

[Mordac]

When did Oklahoma become part of the EU?

Surely only a matter of time...

[NotAllThere]

Great.

Just tell the kids to drunk the girls and will be ok to rape them.

Stupid laws, stupid people.

Eu laws, most of them...

When did Oklahoma become part of the EU?

[NickFitz]

Great.

Just tell the kids to drunk the girls and will be ok to rape them.

Stupid laws, stupid people.

A stupid law and a stupid interpretation thereof: apparently it hinges on a technicality, in that though state law does classify sexual activity with a drunk unconscious victim as rape, it only mentions vaginal and anal penetration, not oral.

I read that even the defence lawyer has said that the authorities were stupid to use the charge they did, as there was another possible charge under different sexual assault legislation, for which their client would almost certainly have been convicted.

[MrMarkyMark]

Great.

Just tell the kids to drunk the girls and will be ok to rape them.

Stupid laws, stupid people.

A combination of drink and drugs is far more effective.

HTH BIDI