Originally posted by unixman
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Should the Lords prayer be banned?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Should the Lords prayer be banned?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI haven't seen anybody on Twitter saying it should be shown.
I have rarely seen the MSM in such wide agreement over an issue. Literally and I mean literally every columnist in every news paper is saying show it, and in no uncertain terms. Only dissenters are the Secular society.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI haven't seen anybody on Twitter saying it should be shown.
Though that just demonstrates that any claim that "Twitter says…" means nothing, as every possible shade of opinion (and quite a few one would have thought were impossible) can be found on there.
It's a godsend to lazy journalists, who can find whatever stripe of opinion they want to claim to have found with a simple search, but it also means that claims that "All of Twitter" says something are inevitably false.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostArchbishop: We find this decision bewildering.
Vicars: We are mildly chagrined by this.
Cameron: it should be shown.
Daily Mail: THIS IS THE END OF LIFE ON EARTH AS WE KNOW IT
Dawkins: the advert should be shown
Every MP: show this advert now
The Devil: Even I want this shown now.
Secular society: We sort of don't want it shown
All of Twitter: it should be shown
Every newspaper columnist: show it! show it! show it!
God: Settle down.
Though that just demonstrates that any claim that "Twitter says…" means nothing, as every possible shade of opinion (and quite a few one would have thought were impossible) can be found on there.
It's a godsend to lazy journalists, who can find whatever stripe of opinion they want to claim exists with a simple search, but it also means that claims that "All of Twitter" says something are inevitably false.
Leave a comment:
-
Archbishop: We find this decision bewildering.
Vicars: We are mildly chagrined by this.
Cameron: it should be shown.
Daily Mail: THIS IS THE END OF LIFE ON EARTH AS WE KNOW IT
Dawkins: the advert should be shown
Every MP: show this advert now
The Devil: Even I want this shown now.
Secular society: We sort of don't want it shown
All of Twitter: it should be shown
Every newspaper columnist: show it! show it! show it!
God: Settle down.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostIf you decide to open a business that only deals with white males then so be it - just do not expect it to do well.
Holy tulip.
Someone who can see the blindingly obvious fact that in a nation of decent people (which presumably democracy advocates think we are) don't need to wave guns in peoples faces to signal inappropriate behaviour.
The market (for both trade & social standing) is plenty enough, as bad behaviour is bad for business!
And all that without having to compromise your principles by getting all violent with people for having a different opinion than you.
Perhaps everyone can sell their votes for something more urgent than siccing the dogs on people who hurt your feelings.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI disagree as they have discriminated against religious groups in general. There are far worse adverts around.
Discrimination keeps us all alive.
Leave a comment:
-
Baby is born without a father to a virgin mother, has special powers, tempted by evil and brough back from the dead.
The other story is about Jesus and is clearly unsuitable for the audience of the former.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostLike Christmas is anything to do with religion.
And I'd love to see Christmas ads banned. And for that matter Christmas, but that's probably a bit radical.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThey aren't "discriminating on Faith". They refuse all religion-related advertising, including advertising for the purpose of rejecting religion. That isn't discrimination.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlueSharp View PostThe UK is a secular country with deep pagan heritage. The Winter Solstice may have been hijacked by the Christians and renamed as Christmas, then the corporates hijacked Christmas selling to the none believers pretty trinkets but their are plenty of other traditions such as Samhain.
I hope the druids complain about the church tacomplaining. Private business are not allowed to discriminate on Faith, Gender or sexual orientation. Remember when other business were taken to court (and rightly so) for refusing to bake a cake/let a B&B room to a gay couple.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostDiscrimination implies favouring one group over others, so the examples you gave are not the same. This is a case of a business refusing all religious ads, not a case of favouring one religious group over another. Of course, if this turns out to be wrong and they are forced to show any religious ads before a cinema screening then get ready for ads with religious messages that you disagree with....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlueSharp View PostThe UK is a secular country with deep christian heritage. Christmas may have been hijacked by the shops selling to the none believers pretty trinkets but their are plenty of other traditions such as Easter.
I hope the church take them to the cleaners. Private business are not allowed to discriminate on Faith, Gender or sexual orientation. Remember when other business were taken to court (and rightly so) for refusing to bake a cake/let a B&B room to a gay couple.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: