Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Huxley Associates - Recruitment Consultancy of the Year 2005"
Here's a thought. A recruitment agency owned and run by contractors. Hire the appropriate sales bods to do the leg work. The contractors do the gigs with the clients. Work done through the agency can be done at a cut price rate, since as shareholders in the co. the divi's from the co. make up for it. Instantly dodges IR35 since all those involved have a 2nd income stream ( divi's ) from the company as well as the contract work done elsewhere.
No I havnt thought it through, it just occoured to me as I read DA's post.
Here's a thought. A recruitment agency owned and run by contractors. Hire the appropriate sales bods to do the leg work. The contractors do the gigs with the clients. Work done through the agency can be done at a cut price rate, since as shareholders in the co. the divi's from the co. make up for it. Instantly dodges IR35 since all those involved have a 2nd income stream ( divi's ) from the company as well as the contract work done elsewhere.
No I havnt thought it through, it just occoured to me as I read DA's post.
Shoot me down in flames if you feel so inclined.
Slight variation that will make you more money and please the clients. Fire all the contractors and hire Indians on work permits and pay them min wage.
Here's a thought. A recruitment agency owned and run by contractors. Hire the appropriate sales bods to do the leg work. The contractors do the gigs with the clients. Work done through the agency can be done at a cut price rate, since as shareholders in the co. the divi's from the co. make up for it. Instantly dodges IR35 since all those involved have a 2nd income stream ( divi's ) from the company as well as the contract work done elsewhere.
No I havnt thought it through, it just occoured to me as I read DA's post.
Why dont we set up a spoof agency next year (register a company at companies house) and vote for it?
Here's a thought. A recruitment agency owned and run by contractors. Hire the appropriate sales bods to do the leg work. The contractors do the gigs with the clients. Work done through the agency can be done at a cut price rate, since as shareholders in the co. the divi's from the co. make up for it. Instantly dodges IR35 since all those involved have a 2nd income stream ( divi's ) from the company as well as the contract work done elsewhere.
No I havnt thought it through, it just occoured to me as I read DA's post.
I had an agency (not Huxley) asking me to vote for them in this. They had simply emailed anyone with whom they had had contact in the last year. In my case I had responded to an ad. They had never replied and never retruned my calls. I sent them a snotty email back on the lines of "you've got to be joking"
Leave a comment: