Mm, ought to pay it back. A couple of K isn't worth looking like a dodgy trader to HMCE.
It does seem to be the norm these days for agencies to ignore the figure on your invoice and instead self-invoice themselves a figure taken completely out of the blue.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Paid too much!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Paid too much!"
Collapse
-
Oh for F$ck sake...
It isn't your money, its theirs, pay it back. (oh sorry I meant tell your mate to pay it back ).
Why do you think they shouldn't be paid it? Would you be happy if you overpaid a supplier and they were not professional/moral and honest enough to pay it back.
In fact I've been know to deliberately overpay suppliers sometimes just to work out who is honest as I can still ask for it back at any time up to six years after the payment was made.
You'll just look like a tw@t when they ask for it if you haven't told them, however you can always phone the MD of the agency and make his staff look like tw@ts whilst covering yourself in glory if you do the correct thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by deforceObviously, he does not want to tell the agency they have paid him too much and pay the money back.
As for VAT: keep in mind that you do not "charge" VAT, you only collect it for the government. If they find out that you have not passed on all that you have collected, they will probably deal with you more leniently than Mr Corleone would. But not much.
Leave a comment:
-
"Just phoned him; he says he's going to lend it to some bloke who's trying to buy a tat shop......"
20% per day he asked for. Bargain!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Actually it is the agency that will get screwed over by the VAT man. His freinds invoices asked for a set amount of VAT money (Lets call it £1000). His freind has then paid customs and excise (or whatever they are called now) the £1000 he asked for. If the agency then claims back £1500 VAT customs and excise will ask the agency to prove that they paid out £1500 in VAT. They will only have an invoice for £1000 VAT hence it is them who are defrauding the VAT man.
Once they realise thier error they will ask for it back, I am not suggesting you don't pay it back as that would be theft, but you may as well make some interest off it while you are waiting hence whack it in a high interest account.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFanOptions
1) Bend down in the shower to pick up the soap
2) Back against the wall
3) Wait for AndyW to drop the soap.
hth
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFanOptions
1) Bend down in the shower to pick up the soap
2) Back against the wall
3) Wait for AndyW to drop the soap.
hth
Hehe,
Just phoned him; he says he's going to lend it to some bloke who's trying to buy a tat shop.......
Leave a comment:
-
Options
1) Bend down in the shower to pick up the soap
2) Back against the wall
3) Wait for AndyW to drop the soap.
hth
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think the VAT will look at it like that. The agency will probably have overclaimed the input tax that they paid to the contractor, and the contractor will have UNDERPAID the output VAT that they collected, regardless of whether or not it was correctly calculated in the first place.
The overpayment that sits in the bank account of our contractor's firm is therefore actually and materially due to be repaid to HMRC as they paid it out via a claim for input VAT. It may be the agencies fault that it happened, but the agency have effectively taken a few thousand from the HMRC and given it direct to our contractor's company !!!
The agency won't have suffered a loss due to their error, but the HMRC will have done, and it will be your mates fault if he keeps the money and doesn't report it.
It could easily be construed as fraud if the VAT people think that the agency and the contractors firm are colluding......
The only defense is ignorance and that won't hold water when the overpayment runs into thousands.
In my opinion.Last edited by oraclesmith; 21 September 2006, 15:39.
Leave a comment:
-
Not a crime
It should be left in the account it was credited. It's not a crime as there is no fraudulent trail, just a simple error like an agency overpaying a contractor. If the money stays in the account and they don't ask for it back, it's legally yours. If the money is taken out, spent or transferred out and they ask for it, then it's got to be repaid (without interest). Same thing as if a cashpoint gives you extra money. Not obliged to hand it back, unless you are asked to AND there is a trail that leads them to your account/card.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by deforceHmmmm....
That's where it gets interesting! Sure, the agency will view it as VAT, but as far as his company is concerned it has received and paid out all of the VAT due on it's invoices. This is 'extra money' that appeared in his company's account....
If he knows (or could reasonably suspect) that it's VAT, then he must notify the firm or the VAT asap.
If he keeps quiet, he is going to get into serious bother when the VAT inspector comes round as he cannot justify his actions. It's not enough to say "wow look the agency fairy left me some extra money, I think I'll keep it !" He could submit it on his next VAT return with an explanatory note and let the VAT people sort it out.
Your 'friend' does NOT want to VAT people to start smelling a rat !!!! Any errors are taken very seriously and they will start suspecting your mate is running a dodgy operation ---Like a cash in hand builder or plumber.
Leave a comment:
-
Surely someone will use the analogy of a plumber or builder - come on people!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oraclesmithTalk to them about paying it back. It's VAT and belongs to the VAT man. Don't mess with the VATman!
That's where it gets interesting! Sure, the agency will view it as VAT, but as far as his company is concerned it has received and paid out all of the VAT due on it's invoices. This is 'extra money' that appeared in his company's account....
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: