This is starting to deviate from my original question , but thanks for all the replies.
I did not know just resigning the service agreement was legally binding - thank you for your advice.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Renewing contract - Only Service Agreement provided?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by unprogram View PostI should not have done that last time but luckily I got away with it.
The case which determined that contracts could be accepted via conduct was determined in 1877. Relying on established case law which has been around for 137 years doesn't seem to be "lucky" - what was special about your case that you think you were lucky to get away with it?
Leave a comment:
-
Ah ok, I have never had this before in any previous contract renewal with a number of agencies, I've always been given the full contract to sign.Originally posted by tractor View PostIt's not shoddy, it is usuall practice to only update the schedule at renewal unless there are specific reasons to update the contract. This is why the salient (operational) points of the contract are contained in the first schedule issued with the original contract. The inference being that nothing in the contract has changed only the start/end/rate/location etc.
I have not started this renewal yet and won't without signing it. I should not have done that last time but luckily I got away with it.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think it's implied but it's standard practice anyway..
Leave a comment:
-
By turning up on the first day of the new gig all parties will still be tied to the last lot of agreements signed so they are still in effect. I forget the exact term. I implied contract?
Leave a comment:
-
It's not shoddy, it is usuall practice to only update the schedule at renewal unless there are specific reasons to update the contract. This is why the salient (operational) points of the contract are contained in the first schedule issued with the original contract. The inference being that nothing in the contract has changed only the start/end/rate/location etc.Originally posted by unprogram View PostHi I offered renew my LTD contract but only for an extra month to complete a handover .
However the new contract that has been sent out is only one page - the 'Service Agreement' . The rest of the contract that I had before is missing.
Is this legal or do I need to see the full contract before signing??
I should add that with the previous contract I read through every clause the wording was all over the place - one weeks notice here /one month notice on the service agreement. I also ended up signing it and dating it after the contract had started as they forgot about me
I want to leave on good terms but I don't really trust this company I am contracting with - they seem a bit shoddy.
Leave a comment:
-
Renewing contract - Only Service Agreement provided?
Hi I offered renew my LTD contract but only for an extra month to complete a handover .
However the new contract that has been sent out is only one page - the 'Service Agreement' . The rest of the contract that I had before is missing.
Is this legal or do I need to see the full contract before signing??
I should add that with the previous contract I read through every clause the wording was all over the place - one weeks notice here /one month notice on the service agreement. I also ended up signing it and dating it after the contract had started as they forgot about me
I want to leave on good terms but I don't really trust this company I am contracting with - they seem a bit shoddy.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: