Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
In my case my agent has asked for 16% let go fee (this is 16% of my hourly rate x 52 weeks a year). Not bad, I am in the wrong business. Should have not opted out in the first place.
My impression is that generally, contractors don't win these types of battles unless the client is on their side. The most likely scenario is that the agency will kick up a big fuss in order to bully the client into refusing to do business with you. If the client is willing to stand against the agency with you then you may have a chance. Quite often the client will put this into the "too difficult" pile and wave goodbye to you. Other times, the client may be willing to pay off the agency to release you from the restraint of trade.
I've tried it a couple of times with contracts I wasn't that bothered about keeping, and in both cases the client back bone failed after the first aggressive call from the agent. Unless the client manager is a hardened ex contractor with an axe to grind then forget it. In one case they could of paid off the agent with 3 months commission but still asked me to sign a new 6 month contract via the agent to avoid getting agency hassle.
That doesn't say you can't make a contract with the customer. Why are you worrying about it?
Possibly because:
a. s/he doesn't understand the other clauses in the contract.
b. s/he has missed some of the wording out.
Anyway I hope the client is someone like BT as agencies tend to write tulip restraint of trade clauses which means that stopping you from working for one of their customers makes the entire clause is unenforceable.
I've never seen a clause where they refer to clients of clients, and I doubt it would be admissable.
Here is an example from a contract:
The Consultant shall not enter into a similar contract with the Client or any member of the Client’s Group or any other person or company with whom the Consultant had material contact in the course of the supply for a period of 12 months after the date of termination
I agree that's probably so broad to be unenforceable and quite apart from that, if the contractor doesn't opt out then it's not enforceable anyway.
Of course the agency doesn't care about that. They would never take it to court, it's just used for bluff and bluster. Hell, it costs them nothing to put that in there and it might make them a bit of money, what have they got to lose?
[QUOTE=Wanderer;1652572]As Northernladuk says, read the opt out sticky and decide if you were opted out. If you didn't agree to opt out at the right time then this clause is possibly unenforceable.
Hi, I dont understand about Opt in, Opt out. What does it mean? I just signed contract to UK agency company. their client is Italian Co. and Italian company's customer is Finnish Co. I'm in Helsinki
I agree I think unusually in this case you can go ahead. It would be the client you couldn't work for. I've never seen a clause where they refer to clients of clients, and I doubt it would be admissable. Must say it's not in the spirit of the law but I think that you would be within your rights, so probably a loophole you can exploit. If you're worried just run it through an accountant/soliciter first.
Can i make contract with Customer company, not Client company?
Reading that again, personally I would give it a shot and never breathe a word to the client or the agency.
A 12 month restriction against working for customers of the client is an unfair restraint of trade in my opinion, presuming that the agency have no existing relationship to the client's customer therefore no business interests to protect....
Taking proper legal advice on that matter may be a good investment.
As Northernladuk says, read the opt out sticky and decide if you were opted out. If you didn't agree to opt out at the right time then this clause is possibly unenforceable.
My impression is that generally, contractors don't win these types of battles unless the client is on their side. The most likely scenario is that the agency will kick up a big fuss in order to bully the client into refusing to do business with you. If the client is willing to stand against the agency with you then you may have a chance. Quite often the client will put this into the "too difficult" pile and wave goodbye to you. Other times, the client may be willing to pay off the agency to release you from the restraint of trade.
Leave a comment: