Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
My comment wasn't necessarily aimed toward the PCG, it just happened to be the topic of the thread.
What I was getting at is it's the IR35 contract reviewers & tax investigation insurers who have the most to lose if it was abolished and they probably aren't very keen on that happening.
Fair enough, but there's a few on here think PCG has some kind of vested interest in keeping IR35 alive, so some of us who know better get a little over-defensive
My comment wasn't necessarily aimed toward the PCG, it just happened to be the topic of the thread.
What I was getting at is it's the IR35 contract reviewers & tax investigation insurers who have the most to lose if it was abolished and they probably aren't very keen on that happening.
For the record, PCG still fights for the total abolition of IR35
Message from the President
Originally posted by Chris Bryce
Please understand that no political party is currently committed to the repeal of IR35 and some demands such as “immediate abolition” or “make HMRC pay penalties for failed investigations” simply will not be met. Asking for them would just make us look foolish.
+1... far too many people making a (very) decent living out of IR35 and the fear of IR35 for them to want it to vanish completely imo.
Very true, although that doesn't include PCG.
For the record, PCG still fights for the total abolition of IR35 and the full recognition of the freelance worker. The aim of the current exercise is to limit IR35 only to those to whom it really applies - which may, of course, turn out to be nobody, although I doubt it - and to act as a deterrent to those tempted to incorporate as an F2M since their lovely tax-avoiding EBTs have been closed down. If PCG can get the typical jobbing contractor out of scope, I see that as a pretty good interim achievment.
It's a bit like America and Al Qaedda, feign hatred and opposition, however actually need the bogeyman to justify policies (charges) and therefore existence. Discuss
+1... far too many people making a (very) decent living out of IR35 and the fear of IR35 for them to want it to vanish completely imo.
It's a bit like America and Al Qaedda, feign hatred and opposition, however actually need the bogeyman to justify policies (charges) and therefore existence. Discuss
Leave a comment: