Public Sector or Not?
Closed Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Posts 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31

    Should post faster


    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    115
    Thanks (Given)
    5
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    19
    Likes (Received)
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    He hasn't got one. His read something somewhere and has decide to fart it on to the forum without thinking again so others have to clean the thread up again.
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.

  2. #32
    eek
    eek is offline

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    22,644
    Thanks (Given)
    265
    Thanks (Received)
    1273
    Likes (Given)
    1074
    Likes (Received)
    3714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    I think that might be because we've discussed RBS 3 times already including with you last week and nothing has changed during the past 3 months.

    RBS is not covered by the FoI act and therefore isn't affected by these changes.
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  3. #33

    I live on CUK

    SueEllen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in the Park
    Posts
    28,255
    Thanks (Given)
    1460
    Thanks (Received)
    1181
    Likes (Given)
    4590
    Likes (Received)
    4287

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eek View Post
    I think that might be because we've discussed RBS 3 times already including with you last week and nothing has changed during the past 3 months.

    RBS is not covered by the FoI act and therefore isn't affected by these changes.
    Stop sucking off the admins.
    "Youíre just a bad memory who doesnít know when to go away" JR

  4. #34

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Non-Event Horizon
    Posts
    8,968
    Thanks (Given)
    370
    Thanks (Received)
    641
    Likes (Given)
    2328
    Likes (Received)
    2739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Words fail me.
    That's a first.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

  5. #35

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    33,989
    Thanks (Given)
    141
    Thanks (Received)
    1504
    Likes (Given)
    1796
    Likes (Received)
    6116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LondonManc View Post
    That's a first.
    Ones that I can post without a ban then....
    'CUK forum personality of 2011' - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  6. #36

    Double Godlike!


    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    10,832
    Thanks (Given)
    827
    Thanks (Received)
    830
    Likes (Given)
    5267
    Likes (Received)
    3059

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SueEllen View Post
    Stop sucking off the admins.


    I thought NAT seemed a lot happier these days

  7. #37

    Godlike


    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Non-Event Horizon
    Posts
    8,968
    Thanks (Given)
    370
    Thanks (Received)
    641
    Likes (Given)
    2328
    Likes (Received)
    2739

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    Teapot explained why RBS wasn't subject to FOI. You backed it up. Not sure what your beef is because Teapot gave you the correct answer with a supporting statement.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

  8. #38

    Some things in Moderation

    cojak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Look to your right...
    Posts
    18,028
    Thanks (Given)
    491
    Thanks (Received)
    1065
    Likes (Given)
    4229
    Likes (Received)
    2820

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by breaktwister View Post
    Just because you suck admins off you think you can get away with abuse while no-one can say anything back as they are then "warned by admins"? I guess the admins will warn or ban me now but you get away with insults and abuse with no consequence.

    Teapot posted that RBS was not a public body without any analysis. All I was saying that that you need to look carefully at the OWNERSHIP of all companies to determine whether they fall within the meaning of a "public authority". I didn't see anyone else posting the info regarding being owned by the Crown.
    No, it does not require analysis - it simply requires reading the list of organisations that fall within the remit of the FOI Act.

    That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Anything else is navel gazing.

    And as we have returned to the original point of this thread I am now locking it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.