- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Edge EBT thread
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by K12AN View PostBut what happens if HMRC (deliberately, randomly or otherwise) chose a users who aren't members of the group? We would be 25 out of over 1000 Edge users? Its also likely that the test users aren't even part of this forum and have no idea about our group. In my mind, it would make sense for them to chose users who have the largest liabilities i.e. who have been using for multiple years - probably into the early 2000's.
If the test case for Edge were to lose, would our group still stand a chance if we were to appeal etc? Would there be any point after an Edge user were to lose?
We can setup the group right now so it's fully populated with members etc.. but it will be premature for the group organisers to start asking group members to stump up cash at this stage.
I believe the group needs to exist as a sleeper cell for now and activated at a moment notice with funds collection initiated when the situation arises i.e when we need to defend the appeal of an Edge EBT member who has lost the test case to HMRC.Last edited by cerner; 18 December 2013, 16:15.Comment
-
Originally posted by cerner View PostThe only cloudy part is weather test case will cover all or will each be required to contest individually. If HMRC chooses to contest individually with almost 20,000 of us the Tribunal court will be busy and stretched till eternity even at rate of one case a week. So I don't think that is really feasible.
"Follower Penalties: users of failed avoidance schemes - This measure will introduce a new obligation for users of an avoidance scheme that HMRC have defeated in a tribunal or court hearing in another party’s litigation, to concede their position to reflect that decision. When there has been a relevant decision HMRC will issue a notice to all users of the scheme in question requiring them to amend their return or advise HMRC why they believe they should not. A tax-geared penalty would be charged if they failed to amend their return and it was subsequently found that the avoidance scheme they used failed on the same point of law. Taxpayers will be able to appeal against the penalty.
Accelerated tax payment in avoidance cases - Legislation will be included in Finance Bill 2014 to require payment of the tax in dispute in a tax avoidance enquiry when an ‘avoidance follower penalty notice’ is issued. This will take effect from Royal Assent which is expected mid July 2014.
At present taxpayers (in most cases) can hold on to the disputed tax while the dispute is being investigated. This can take a number of years, and there is evidence that some taxpayers enter into avoidance schemes primarily for the cash flow benefit. "Comment
-
Originally posted by cerner View PostLooks like If HMRC decide to pick a taxpayer caught in Edge EBT with a weak defence and if it becomes clear that it's going to be a test case fits all scenario then our response will be to contribute a fighting fund at that stage to back his appeal so he has a greater chance of overturning the ruling in our favour at the appeal.
However, in the mean time, it would leave you slightly exposed if HMRC start asking for stuff. At the moment, all you've had to do is lodge an appeal. What if they send out a list of detailed questions or request information?
They did this with us but Montpelier always drafted the replies for us.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
However, in the mean time, it would leave you slightly exposed if HMRC start asking for stuff. At the moment, all you've had to do is lodge an appeal. What if they send out a list of detailed questions or request information?
If Edge won't show their face to support the evidence gathering stage and questions request information etc.. It will be asking too much of lawyers to step in and take the place of Edge. It will be a near impossible task of asking the lawyers to turn water into wine.
Like bigdug pointed out in all cases where the taxpayer have won against HMRC, the loan provider has not done a runner but instead fully supported the taxpayer in every way possible.
Hopefully Edge will feel guilty enough to support us somehow even if they don't want to show their faces. They might chose to support us via proxy i.e mystery poster bigdug posting from Isle of man.Last edited by cerner; 18 December 2013, 16:53.Comment
-
Originally posted by cerner View PostI'm afraid at information request or evidence gathering stage, the lawyers can't do anything tangible here. This is where Edge should step in. The lawyers can't replace the responsibility of the loan provider at this stage.
If Edge won't show their face to support the evidence gathering stage and questions request information etc.. It will be asking too much of lawyers to step in and take the place of Edge. It will be a near impossible task of asking the lawyers to turn water into wine.
Like bigdug pointed out in all cases where the taxpayer have won against HMRC, the loan provider has not done a runner but instead fully supported the taxpayer in every way possible.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc-...ml#post1858160
I'd rather rely on a tax advisor like him than a defunct outfit like Edge.
As for bigdud...Comment
-
Originally posted by cerner View PostThey might chose to support us via proxy i.e mystery poster bigdug posting from Isle of man.Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdug View PostI think this will be dealt with in next years Finance Bill. The following was announced on 5 December 2013:
"Follower Penalties: users of failed avoidance schemes - This measure will introduce a new obligation for users of an avoidance scheme that HMRC have defeated in a tribunal or court hearing in another party’s litigation, to concede their position to reflect that decision. When there has been a relevant decision HMRC will issue a notice to all users of the scheme in question requiring them to amend their return or advise HMRC why they believe they should not. A tax-geared penalty would be charged if they failed to amend their return and it was subsequently found that the avoidance scheme they used failed on the same point of law. Taxpayers will be able to appeal against the penalty.
Accelerated tax payment in avoidance cases - Legislation will be included in Finance Bill 2014 to require payment of the tax in dispute in a tax avoidance enquiry when an ‘avoidance follower penalty notice’ is issued. This will take effect from Royal Assent which is expected mid July 2014.
At present taxpayers (in most cases) can hold on to the disputed tax while the dispute is being investigated. This can take a number of years, and there is evidence that some taxpayers enter into avoidance schemes primarily for the cash flow benefit. "
In your opinion, what is the legal position of taxpayers if HMRC already acted on the so called discovery back then which was not really a discovery at all for them as they were aware of it and took action they thought was necessary back then.
If it was proven that not only did HMRC discover the loan payment back then but they also took action they deemed necessary at the time by imposing tax on the interest on the loan and also increasing our tax code as a result of the loan back in 2008. Do they have a legal ground to go back and say "Actually the action we took back then was not severe enough, we want to go back and take further action" which is exactly what they are trying to do right now.Last edited by cerner; 18 December 2013, 17:33.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostHave a read of what Saleos said regarding responding to HMRC questions/requests for information.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc-...ml#post1858160
I'd rather rely on a tax advisor like him than a defunct outfit like Edge.
As for bigdud...
Lawyers will obviously have role to play further down the line but not at the detailed enquiry assessment request stage. This should be for the loan providerLast edited by cerner; 18 December 2013, 17:37.Comment
-
varunksinghvarunksingh
- Thanks (Given):
- 0
- Thanks (Received):
- 0
- Likes (Given):
- 0
- Likes (Received):
- 0
Originally posted by Michael J Perry FCA View PostThe timing of this post is quite relevant.
At this time there is no 'lead case' appeal concerning a test case on Edge (as far as I am aware) and therefore 'Group Representation' for related cases is not an issue. There are potential problems for an individual becoming a member of a group in these circumstances and the decision should be carefully weighed up at the time.
I have been dealing with cases on HMRC and ex-Edge employees going back to January 2007 and although each case will have obvious similarities, there are always factors that make each case unique.
HMRC deal with each case on its own facts and with each individual. You will all know that HMRC are not dealing with any 'group' but with you.
It is tempting to join the crowd in what seems like an easy solution to the problem at minimum cost, but you may not be aware of all the issues or how things are likely to proceed.
My observations and prediction (subject to change) at this time are:
1. The case of Philip Boyle may have little in common with the EBT loan scheme operated by Edge but that is not the point. The important fact of the decision in this case (the first of its kind) is that it goes some way towards clarifying the existing law at the time you were a member of the scheme and HMRC won on all counts. The taxpayer has been given a right of appeal. That is the case you should be supporting irrespective of what scheme you were with!
2. HMRC are likely to write to you in the New Year with a view to determining your Section 9A Enquiries (if you have them) and/or your Section 29 Discovery Income Tax assessments and could issue Closure Notices to move things along.
They will also want to review all earlier and any missed later years (subject to any limitations).
3. These matters are also relevant (if you are not burying your head in the sand):
Consider a Voluntary Settlement while you still have time (this will suit very few cases)
Consider your defences
Your potential total Income Tax bill for ALL years
National Insurance (if HMRC go down the 'employment' route)
Determining the applicable tax due date (possibly earlier)
Late Payment Surcharges
Late Payment Penalties
Interest on Late Payment
Tax Geared Penalties relating to a possible Failure to Notify or to submit Tax Returns and/or Inaccuracies in Tax Returns (these can be up to 70% of the tax bill)
Failure to Disclose (you did not tell HMRC but they found out!)
So I think these are the real issues and you would be wise to agree a Fixed Fee with a properly qualified and experienced Specialist for your own individual case before the **** hits the proverbial fan.
1) Why all should support Boyle case? What are the benefits?
2) Why law in particular was clarified for during the years of operation of Edge?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment