• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IQ Consultants, Felicitas Solutions, ECS Trustees - loan repayment demands

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Whowouldhavethought View Post
    This is actually petrifying.
    and very true

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Emily1985 View Post
    I agree I’ve been a member since the weekend and the recent few weeks posts I have reviewed aren’t good reading on here to put it politely.

    Trust in your legal opinions and not comments from posters. The Admin on the account did warn persons a few weeks ago . The app allows you to block ignore people as one poster mentions .


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
    My only question - are those legal opinions looking at the correct problem in the correct jurisdiction or are they looking at what you were led to believe the problem and jurisdiction is?

    Leave a comment:


  • Emily1985
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Yes, people should speak to a professional, one that has the backing of a professional body.

    I think that a Eek has been saying that. Don’t go by the recommendation of anonymous posters.
    Well said here , seek legal advice and just interact with them and don’t respond to certain comments here , I know it must be hard not to give your 5 pence worth but it’s just fuel for the fire . Life is too short to let people get to you .


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • Emily1985
    replied
    Originally posted by Superfly View Post
    The best thing people can do once they engage a professional adviser is to stay off this forum. If you must come on, then my advice is be passive and do not post anything.

    Have some trust in your adviser, let them deal with it, that is what you are paying him/her for.

    I think you will find that the forum will not add value once you have engaged a professional. I think it will be counter-intuitive to the benefit you should be experiencing when engaging an adviser. If you have any questions, direct them to your adviser. And don't advertise on here what your adviser tells you, do not share any emails or mailshots on here.

    Remember you cannot trust everyone on here, you don't even know who we all are. And it doesn't really matter to you if the admin know who they are.
    I agree I’ve been a member since the weekend and the recent few weeks posts I have reviewed aren’t good reading on here to put it politely.

    Trust in your legal opinions and not comments from posters. The Admin on the account did warn persons a few weeks ago . The app allows you to block ignore people as one poster mentions .


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • Invisiblehand
    replied
    Originally posted by Tezz View Post
    The mods should be banning eek based on his recent Verbal diarrhoea scaremongering, it might be useful if he were a professional advisor, but he isn’t!

    I’m in the same boat as you. Ignore him.
    Eek has been a member here for many years and as far as I’m aware doesn’t have any commercial benefit to directing people in one way or another. Some on here do and often they are the ones with smoke and mirrors.

    Much of the most sensible statements on here over the years have been from people giving advice seeking nothing in return. Iliketax is a good example.

    It’s a tulipty situation but slamming people who have been posting on here for ten years isn’t the answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Superfly View Post
    It consumed your thoughts since the THL letters, hmmm so much so that you only joined this forum 3 months ago rather than 18 months ago when THL were trying to screw people over.

    That's enough bo11x from trojan posters for one night, time for bed for me.
    Thl was a different scam as there was fear of the loan charge to scam money from.

    Those opportunities have finished - there are zero opportunities to screw people out of money - so ask yourself how big a final payoff do you think these people want...

    And imagine how proud they would be if it was 100% with interest on top and all achieved 100% legally.

    Now you may not like it but I have reasons to believe that's their plan.
    Last edited by eek; 17 August 2020, 23:24.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Tezz View Post
    The mods should be banning eek based on his recent Verbal diarrhoea scaremongering, it might be useful if he were a professional advisor, but he isn’t!

    I’m in the same boat as you. Ignore him.
    But they haven't banned me nor have they asked me to stop posting - so ask yourself why?

    And yes I have slightly more rights than other posters, in that even though I'm not involved or a member of a scheme I can post in this forum (unlike most cuk posters)so again ask yourself why I'm allowed to post here..

    And I don't come here to scare the posters in this forum - I come here to stop them from doing something stupid like posting a response saying the debt is time served ( as it usually isnt and you've just confirmed the debt is valid).

    Or as in this case to tell posters to stop continuing ignoring a problem because they think it's a scam of type X when I have evidence that's it's actually a different scam and i suspect your problems are going to get a lot worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Superfly View Post
    Are you two a tag team? One spews technical jargon and the other quivers on demand.
    Nope - but just go back and read the posts and ask yourself why do I suddenly find revocable trusts so interesting - what changed for me to go from what I was posting on Tuesday last week (which was merely find your loan paperwork and ignore the FCA and Gladstones) to what I'm posting now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Superfly
    replied
    Originally posted by Whowouldhavethought View Post
    For me its more that the Mods aren't stepping in. That would suggest that maybe there is something happening that we may not be aware of.

    And yes, Im concerned. This has consumed my thoughts since the THL letters.
    It consumed your thoughts since the THL letters, hmmm so much so that you only joined this forum 3 months ago rather than 18 months ago when THL were trying to screw people over.

    That's enough bo11x from trojan posters for one night, time for bed for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tezz
    replied
    Originally posted by Whowouldhavethought View Post
    For me its more that the Mods aren't stepping in. That would suggest that maybe there is something happening that we may not be aware of.

    And yes, Im concerned. This has consumed my thoughts since the THL letters.
    The mods should be banning eek based on his recent Verbal diarrhoea scaremongering, it might be useful if he were a professional advisor, but he isn’t!

    I’m in the same boat as you. Ignore him.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X