• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Loan charge - review outcomes - impact on settlement

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ltdoptions
    replied
    Anything pre-2011 should absolutely be thrown out & all closed years should stay closed. Wishful thinking though probably.

    There does seem to be a slight thawing in their attitude on TTP / enforcement, although actions will speak louder than words on that one. I don't believe they won't press for bankruptcies.

    Leave a comment:


  • dammit chloe
    replied
    Originally posted by mr_786 View Post
    Why do you say 2011 specifically? Just curious... as my loans are after 2011
    As someone just said that is when the Disguised Remuneration terminology came in, in that years finance bill.

    Not that I think they are ready for any sort of compromise yet. I am just suggesting that if there is it will probably use landmarks dates or tax status rather than invent something new. This would make it clear and easy to implement. It could equally well be closed years are recognised as closed as per House Of Lords recommendations.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ltdoptions
    replied
    Originally posted by mr_786 View Post
    Why do you say 2011 specifically? Just curious... as my loans are after 2011
    The 2011 Finance Bill was a flag in the sand regarding their view of DR schemes .

    Leave a comment:


  • mr_786
    replied
    Originally posted by dammit chloe View Post
    No. There may be some concessions but I doubt that it would be wholly removed. If there is enough pressure there may be a partial concession maybe from 2011, as suggested, or closed years remain closed. Any concession would have to tie into existing legislation somehow, not create some new class of legislation.
    Why do you say 2011 specifically? Just curious... as my loans are after 2011

    Leave a comment:


  • dammit chloe
    replied
    Originally posted by mr_786 View Post
    Does anyone believe genuinely that review might remove the retrospective nature of the loan charge? I am hoping against hope ....
    No. There may be some concessions but I doubt that it would be wholly removed. If there is enough pressure there may be a partial concession maybe from 2011, as suggested, or closed years remain closed. Any concession would have to tie into existing legislation somehow, not create some new class of legislation.

    Leave a comment:


  • webberg
    replied
    Originally posted by mr_786 View Post
    Does anyone believe genuinely that review might remove the retrospective nature of the loan charge? I am hoping against hope ....
    Even if your hope was realised, HMRC maintain that liability from the year of payment exists and where that year is open they will continue chasing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • mr_786
    replied
    Any realistic hope?

    Does anyone believe genuinely that review might remove the retrospective nature of the loan charge? I am hoping against hope ....

    Leave a comment:


  • dammit chloe
    replied
    Originally posted by freddythefrog View Post
    I'm a bit confused here, are we saying that any loans prior to 2010 should be classed as closed years? I have loans dating back to 2005 and are still open?
    No. It's one of the possible scenarios that could come out of the review being done. The reason being that was when the first DR laws came in. So before that there were no specific laws regarding DR and hence should not apply is the reasoning.

    Read the first message on the thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • freddythefrog
    replied
    Originally posted by ContractorSeven View Post
    Hang on... let me check I have this right. I don't have any open years and all of my loans are for closed years pre-2010. If I make this assumption then I won't owe anything at all. What am I missing?
    I'm a bit confused here, are we saying that any loans prior to 2010 should be classed as closed years? I have loans dating back to 2005 and are still open?

    Leave a comment:


  • webberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Erhaab View Post
    I'm gearing up to settle but as around 50% of my loans are in unprotected years I'm following webberg's strategy of progressing to the point of contract and then waiting for the review.

    My current challenge is how to make sure HMRC structure the contract in a way that will allow me to settle just the protected years (should the loan charge be amended) or settle both protected and unprotected years (should the loans charge remain unchanged).

    Am not sure if I should ask for separate contracts for the protected and unprotected years or whether a single contract provides the flexibility (I haven't seen a contract). Would appreciate the views of anyone else in a similar position.
    A contract is a contract.

    If your contract includes both open and closed years, then that is the settlement.

    If you want to settle open years only, your contract needs to be open years only.

    Write and tell HMRC you want to settle open years only.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X