I agree with you AtW with this incident.
Successive high ranking Police chiefs are fairly consistant that the final decisions on actually firing firearms rest with the officer/s in the fronline. I agree with such a policy provided those officers have been trained to make such decisions with controlled minds under extreme conditions. Which is part and parcel of proper training.
It is those who ordered ill-trained officers into such a situation that are the ones to put the spotlight on. What riles me is the assumption (gleefully re-enforced by Ian Bliar's propoganda) that those who actually executed Menezes (I'm talking the shooter/s not the restrainers) were anything like 'highly trained'. In that regard those officers were not necessarily at fault that their training was so woefully inadequate.
Now it seems this policy may have been deliberately overridden in this incident in which case the Police command were guilty of 'panicking' by not allowing front-line officers to use their own initiative. i.e "We don't care what you think or achieve, kill him anyway" type of orders.
---------------------
If all the officers in that incident were highly trained, were they acting on direct orders, "not to consider their own initiative but to kill the suspect no matter what" ?
Such orders would have been IMO criminally negligent.
Either way, I accept it unlikely those who executed Menezes are the ones to blame. Either it is those complicit in ordering ill-trained officers into that situation, or those who ordered highly trained officers in, but told them not to use their initiative & training but to kill the suspect anyway.
Successive high ranking Police chiefs are fairly consistant that the final decisions on actually firing firearms rest with the officer/s in the fronline. I agree with such a policy provided those officers have been trained to make such decisions with controlled minds under extreme conditions. Which is part and parcel of proper training.
It is those who ordered ill-trained officers into such a situation that are the ones to put the spotlight on. What riles me is the assumption (gleefully re-enforced by Ian Bliar's propoganda) that those who actually executed Menezes (I'm talking the shooter/s not the restrainers) were anything like 'highly trained'. In that regard those officers were not necessarily at fault that their training was so woefully inadequate.
Now it seems this policy may have been deliberately overridden in this incident in which case the Police command were guilty of 'panicking' by not allowing front-line officers to use their own initiative. i.e "We don't care what you think or achieve, kill him anyway" type of orders.
---------------------
If all the officers in that incident were highly trained, were they acting on direct orders, "not to consider their own initiative but to kill the suspect no matter what" ?
Such orders would have been IMO criminally negligent.
Either way, I accept it unlikely those who executed Menezes are the ones to blame. Either it is those complicit in ordering ill-trained officers into that situation, or those who ordered highly trained officers in, but told them not to use their initiative & training but to kill the suspect anyway.

Comment