Originally posted by Scoobos
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Strategies for working with Off-shore testers?
Collapse
X
-
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Originally posted by cojak View PostNow for the purposes of this thread I'm assuming I'm the one at fault here.Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNeed more information. What approach to testing are they using? Scripted or exploratory or both? Are they insisting on having everything documented before they test? If so, I'm sure AtW can recommend a machine gun.
I've not had this conversation with anyone yet. I thought that they were doing a bit of both but it's becoming painfully obvious from their emails that they seem to be wanting scripts only. So know I guess I need to find out exactly how they want this presented (Hear that? That's the shattering of Agile hopes against the cold light of day, that is...).
I feel a blog post coming up...
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostAh, the penny is beginning to drop.
I've not had this conversation with anyone yet. I thought that they were doing a bit of both but it's becoming painfully obvious from their emails that they seem to be wanting scripts only. So know I guess I need to find out exactly how they want this presented (Hear that? That's the shattering of Agile hopes against the cold light of day, that is...).
I feel a blog post coming up...
You could tell them to join the 21st century and learn about context driven testing, exploratory testing, session based test management and so on. On the other hand, you can grin and bear it; I wouldn't want you to encourage them to move on to modern testing approaches as that would be creating extra competition for me.
But if you want to know more about how to test, as opposed to how to tick boxes, start here;
http://www.satisfice.com/
and here;
http://context-driven-testing.com/
I think what they're actually doing is more akin to this;
http://www.satisfice.com/presentations/fake.pdfLast edited by Mich the Tester; 14 June 2012, 12:00.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You could of course use your right to substitution if you are not cut out for the role'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
I have done several trips to "help" some off-shore vendors.
A lot depends on the managers.
I mean the team manager and the managers of other teams around them.
The strongest managers will transfer under performing members to other teams or when they are under pressure they will borrow staff.
The team member will be instructed to send a mail to their client asking a question and say something about waiting for a reply. The will be on loan until you reply in full. If the stronger manager still needs them, repeat.
One manager told us about the problem in private, we had to invent some security issue that required the section of the office that the team were working in, to be screened off with a security door that could only be accessed by a team card. Just to stop other managers stealing our staff.
I am not saying this is your issue, but most of the time things are not what they seam.
Try to make friends with at least one member of the team, and try to get the back-story on what’s really going on.Fiscal nomad it's legal.Comment
-
Is this 'offshore' team located in a country with about one billion citizens working at 'CMM level 5'?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAh yes, the procedural school of quality anal cysts. They're a pain in the arse and I can't bring myself to call them 'testers'.
You could tell them to join the 21st century and learn about context driven testing, exploratory testing, session based test management and so on. On the other hand, you can grin and bear it; I wouldn't want you to encourage them to move on to modern testing approaches as that would be creating extra competition for me.
But if you want to know more about how to test, as opposed to how to tick boxes, start here;
James Bach - Satisfice, Inc.
and here;
Context Driven Testing
I think what they're actually doing is more akin to this;
http://www.satisfice.com/presentations/fake.pdf"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIs this 'offshore' team located in a country with about one billion citizens working at 'CMM level 5'?"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostNope, within the EU.
1; try and change their approach or get your clientco to change the testing company. This might work if you know A LOT about testing and can give the arguments needed.
2; Grin and bear it, but let them stuff it all up and prove that offshore testing and all that waterfall bollocks just doesn't work. Testing is a craft, just like programming; craftspeople (testers and programmers and DBAs and so on) should be working together closely, preferably in the same room, and to be really productive, sitting next to each other working together.
3; tell your clientco to speak to me; I'll charge them a truckload of money but I'll set them up with a test team that works.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment