Girls as young as 11 performing sex acts on rows of boys

[Platypus]

blah

Ok fair enough, by "things of that nature" I was referring to the wider issue of porn, not that one specific act.

You did rather go off the ******* ***** ***** **** deep end about it, so on that basis, I stand by you being a dick

[pacharan]

That's all I can imagine pacharan was saying, and I agree with him.

Not sure about the 11 yrs bit, may have been younger, could have been older.

The basic gist of the article was that the younger kids are taught such things, the more likely they are to be gay (this anilingus reference was in the context of things that men can do together) and that would be a good thing as the more gay people there are, the less homophobia. According to Tatchell, anyway.

I'll post a link when I get the chance.

[Old Hack]

But not penguins obviously, I expect they do it all the time.

Dirty stinking filthy heathen beasts. No, we even avoid TV when they're on in case they're up to despotically lecherous sex acts

[xoggoth]

PS for the usual sort who imply it's all an exaggeration of the DM, it's in the Independent too. It is an official report to MPs after all.

Sadistic child abuse is rife across Britain, MPs warned - Crime - UK - The Independent

The internet is a tool in this, no more. Child abuse is widespread throughout the world, probably less here than many places because it is taken so seriously. In third world /developing countries little action is taken.

[Old Hack]

Ok fair enough, by "things of that nature" I was referring to the wider issue of porn, not that one specific act.

You did rather go off the ******* ***** ***** **** deep end about it, so on that basis, I stand by you being a dick

Pacharan wasn't going on about the wider issues of porn, he was going on about lecherously perverted sex acts like analingus. You are the who went off the spring board with your lunatic observations its cool, we should discuss it.

Point stands, you can keep the dick Epithet

[Platypus]

The basic gist of the article was that the younger kids are taught such things, the more likely they are to be gay (this anilingus reference was in the context of things that men can do together) and that would be a good thing as the more gay people there are, the less homophobia. According to Tatchell, anyway.

In the words of Old Hack ****ing c****** **** f******* b******* c**** w****** !!!! FFS !!!! *****

Anyway, IMO, that really is messed up thinking.

[MarillionFan]

Not sure about the 11 yrs bit, may have been younger, could have been older.

The basic gist of the article was that the younger kids are taught such things, the more likely they are to be gay (this anilingus reference was in the context of things that men can do together) and that would be a good thing as the more gay people there are, the less homophobia. According to Tatchell, anyway.

I'll post a link when I get the chance.

It wasn't a good article.

We are in a period of sexual enlightenment for kids. Or more beit access to sexual perversions of all kind. Mr Tatchell was explaining that for some areas that are abhorrent to others are pleasurable for another. Rightly so. But then again Mr Tatchell has only the viewpoint of pleasure because the normal act of sex is to procreate something thank **** that twat will never do.

[Platypus]

blah

yawn.

[Old Hack]

Blah

Can't help yourself can you? Completely wrong in the first instance, yet can't help but keep it going?

I have kids. It's unacceptable, it's reprehensible. It's wrong on so many levels.

And yes, it's ****ed up thinking

[NotAllThere]

...But nothing wrong with explaining what pornography is and that it does not represent typical or normal sexual behaviour

Shhh. Not in front of the younger members of this forum. You'll be saying next that Santa Claus doesn't exist.