The whole thread is now about climate scientists, criminal investigations and their misdemeanors.
It's ended up dragging them through the mud again.
I don't think that was the original aim.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Latest Leaked Climate Documents Scandal
Collapse
X
-
I have a simple question for pjclarke
a yes or a no would be enough
If you knew then what you know now, would you have created this thread ?Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostMeh. James Hansen being arrested and quickly released for a misdemeanor while standing up for his principles at a protest equates to 'facing the public prosecutor'?
You're just wierd.
You can try that one if you like:
Polar Bear Scientist Investigated; Fueled Climate Debate - ABC News
But it does like your "whistle blower" may have commited an offence doesn't it.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostYou're just wierd.
His life is one endless round of frantic pot noodles.Leave a comment:
-
Meh. James Hansen being arrested and quickly released for a misdemeanor while standing up for his principles at a protest equates to 'facing the public prosecutor'?
You're just wierd.Leave a comment:
-
Personally, I will believe that making public the sources and destination of the sceptics £6million is in the public interest
the same day that the warmist £600million sources and uses are similarly published.Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Not really. I think Gleick made a criminal error of judgement which has ruined his individual credibility, and no doubt will be exploited to try and damage the movement he supports.
However, this is akin to a reporter posing as a third party to obtain information in the public interest. The leaked documents are highly damaging to Heartland's claim to be an educational organisation exempt from tax, and no doubt the US IRS will be investigating. To recap
It is the case that Heartland are proposing to use money from an anonymous multimillionaire to pay David Wojick, a lobbyist with a doctorate in epistimology, to create a school curriculum that is classic 'teach the controversy' where there is none, tactics borrowed from the creationist lobby.
It is the case that they fund the 'NIPCC' report, which is scientific claptrap.
It is the case that they slip Fred Singer, who disseminates demonstrably false information over the internet, $5K/month.
George Monbiot – Plutocracy, Pure and Simple
No climate scientist is facing the public prosecutor. You made that up.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostAgreed. I think McIntyre has it right.
I suppose you must really regret bninging the topic up now. Eggs and faces spring to mind.
Yet another climate scientist facing the public prosecutor.Last edited by BlasterBates; 21 February 2012, 10:12.Leave a comment:
-
Agreed. I think McIntyre has it right.
No one should feel any satisfaction in these events, which have been highly damaging to everyone touched by them, including both Heartland and Gleick.Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: