Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Train operators accused of 'astronomical' fare rises
Collapse
X
-
All UK trains are leased thus no depreciation. Train companies own FA, any old fart with no assets can get a franchise as long as he passes a brown envelope to the right person."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Originally posted by Paddy View PostAll UK trains are leased thus no depreciation.
So you think the magical word "leasing" defied laws of physics? How about going and lease a car - do you think car will stop depreciate or maybe the person who bought the car to lease it out actually included into the price (plus margin) this depreciation?Comment
-
No. Rules of accountancyOriginally posted by AtW View Post
So you think the magical word "leasing" defied laws of physics? How about going and lease a car - do you think car will stop depreciate or maybe the person who bought the car to lease it out actually included into the price (plus margin) this depreciation?"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
WTF accountancy has got to do with economic effectiveness of cars vs trains when it comes to depreciation?Originally posted by Paddy View PostNo. Rules of accountancy
I said very clearly that trains don't depreciate as near as badly as cars - I've used trains in this country that must have been at least 30 years old, yet they were still working with non-zero value so depreciation was clearly maybe not even 3% per annum, compare this to cars losing 50% after 3 years.
Just because you lease asset does not mean you are immune from depreciation - you will be paying it via your leased payments because people who buy to lease ain't as retarded as you when it comes to economics.
Comment
-
разъёба !Originally posted by AtW View PostWTF accountancy has got to do with economic effectiveness of cars vs trains when it comes to depreciation?
I said very clearly that trains don't depreciate as near as badly as cars - I've used trains in this country that must have been at least 30 years old, yet they were still working with non-zero value so depreciation was clearly maybe not even 3% per annum, compare this to cars losing 50% after 3 years.
Just because you lease asset does not mean you are immune from depreciation - you will be paying it via your leased payments because people who buy to lease ain't as retarded as you when it comes to economics.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Well here's an idea. Bugger off over to China to build SKA, and irritate the life out of a bunch of shovelheaded CUKers who might even give a tulip!Originally posted by AtW View PostChina is planning to build like 12,000 miles of high speed rail track in the next 5 years alone ffs.
HTH“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
The whole concept of "peak time" fares is what really gets me. Trains are not more expensive to run at those times, just more in demand (I did write popular there but then realised only a fecking sadist, pervert or civil servant could really enjoy rush hour train journeys. Trains are public transport and the public NEEDS to travel at those times. Charging more to counter demand for weekend football matches I could put up with, no one NEEDS to be on those trains. Squeezing out passengers trying to get to work by extortionate pricing is in my opinion unethical.
I've never seen a bus company charge more during rush hour.
When I travelled regularly by train in The Netherlands it didn't matter what time you travelled or when you bought your ticket... the price was the same.Coffee's for closersComment
-
That's surely can't be possible - contradicts common sense, laws of physics etcOriginally posted by Spacecadet View PostWhen I travelled regularly by train in The Netherlands it didn't matter what time you travelled or when you bought your ticket... the price was the same.
Comment
-
I would, but I don't think the Chinese people will be as tolerant as the British folkOriginally posted by shaunbhoy View PostWell here's an idea. Bugger off over to China to build SKA, and irritate the life out of a bunch of shovelheaded CUKers who might even give a tulip!
Comment
-
What does "tolerant" mean? Never heard of it!!!Originally posted by AtW View PostI would, but I don't think the Chinese people will be as tolerant as the British folk
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment