Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
84-year-old gurkha gets to stay in uk
Collapse
X
-
So perhaps if they retire after the ruling was made they have the same rights as Commonwealth citiens? -
Surely not applying retrospectively could be termed as discriminatory (ageist?)Originally posted by The Lone GunmanPossibly something to do with his age? When do you think he retired? Were those rule changes retrospective to all?How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
No, I guess it's about terms of service when you served. Like any contract, I suppose.Originally posted by TrollSurely not applying retrospectively could be termed as discriminatory (ageist?)Comment
-
Don't know the detail, going from memory. No time for research.
Gurkhas were treated differently for valid reasons. Nepal, debt of honour, fierce pride etc...
Law changed for comonwealth fighters.
Law changed years later for Gurkhas.
Bottom line. This bloke fell outside rules. Some jobsworth wouldn't flex.
At 84 he will have seen action with a regiment whos battle honours are without question and he will have served when those honours were hardest won.
He deserves everything this nation can offer.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
The terms of service which they signed up to, said that all Ghurkhas were to be discharged back to Nepal, & had pay & pension settlements different to UK personnelOriginally posted by Old GregNo, I guess it's about terms of service when you served. Like any contract, I suppose.
All have been changedHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
It's relative though isn't it, the rate was a good local pay hence the fierce competition to join up.Originally posted by angusgloverLike I said, only recently.
The pay was not backdated or anything like that. They served for us basically for a pittence (sp).How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
So if these guys get automatic UK citizenship why didnt he?Originally posted by TrollOh.. and automatic UK citizenship
Oh thats right, he couldnt demonstrate a link to this country!
MailmanComment
-
And what the fook would YOU know about service to this country you fecking xenophobic dimwit? I suppose the fact that the country is unlikely ever to be desperate enough to require any service you might be able to provide it means you feel immune to considering the efforts of others that due to nothing more than an accident of birth were not born here? W anker!!Originally posted by TrollIt's relative though isn't it, the rate was a good local pay hence the fierce competition to join up.“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
You should actually read what you post before you proffer anything up as evidence as a simple click on the link would have brought you to this;Originally posted by TrollIt's on other pages...http://www.army.mod.uk/soldierwelfar...gon/index.html
New citizen rights for Commonwealth Service personnel - Commonwealth soldiers serving in the British Armed Forces abroad can now gain UK citizenship under a change to the rules announced by the Home Office on 22 November 2006.
To reflect the commitment and sacrifice made by Service personnel from outside the UK in the British forces, they will now be eligible to apply for citizenship despite having been stationed abroad for the majority of their service.
So in effect the old geezer would still have been fooked because he wasnt resident in the UK anyways.Under the new rules they will no longer be required to complete five years residency in the UK (three years if married to or the civil partner of a British citizen) before applying to become a British citizen. Instead, time spent serving anywhere in the world will be counted towards the residency requirement.
In fact this change was brought in after instances last year where people who had been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan had their permanent residence applications declined by the home office because they had been out of the country for more than 9 months over the previous 4 year period.
In essence the Ghurka's are second class soldiers.
MailmanComment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoyAnd what the fook would YOU know about service to this country you fecking xenophobic dimwit? I suppose the fact that the country is unlikely ever to be desperate enough to require any service you might be able to provide it means you feel immune to considering the efforts of others that due to nothing more than an accident of birth were not born here? W anker!!
Even Shaun got to peel potatoes for his country
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment