• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Oh Dear: Is there any other country in Europe where this would cause outrage ?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    This Mickey Mouse unproven theory is of little use to anyone except the number theory boffs. To see you reel with the spelling and attempt to gain the upper hand in such a puerile doltish fashion was funny indeed. Now stop trying to be clever you are embarrassing yourself, even I feel sorry for you and I’m not known for my sensitivity. I took number theory in my final year actually and this must be the most forgettable little wossname that no doubt The prof at Princeton has moved onto once Fermat’s last was sorted. I hadn’t actually remembered the name but as one does at a certain level knew of the thing.

    Now back to my conjectures please?

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
      Many have pointed the finger and screamed BNP.
      None have yet explained what is wrong with said rant?
      Just because you find the BNP distasteful it does not make them wrong.
      Even NL drones seem to be in agreement, yet they still shout racist at the BNP.
      The BNP is your classic propoganda machine. They deny racism on the surface but base all thier policies around it and use it to try and realise thier objectives. The fact that so many people these days seem to be blinkered into thinking the BNP is just saying what the average man on the street is thinking prooves just how good they have got at it.

      On the surface the rant looks reasonable but if you look at the undertones and focus on the way it is worded it looks like a peice of propoganda. It tries to push you to the authors point of view in a subtle way and would be the first in a serious of works that would become more and more outragous until you don't see a problem with outright racism and belive that all the foreign devils are behind all the woes of this country.

      If you can't see it for what it is, you have already fallen for it.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Causus Deli
        Now stop trying to be clever you are embarrassing yourself, even I feel sorry for you and I’m not known for my sensitivity. I took number theory in my final year actually and this must be the most forgettable little wossname that no doubt The prof at Princeton has moved onto once Fermat’s last was sorted. I hadn’t actually remembered the name but as one does at a certain level knew of the thing.

        Now back to my conjectures please?
        Esteemed members of the forum, I leave you now to judge how seriously to take this cretin.
        Hard Brexit now!
        #prayfornodeal

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by sasguru
          Esteemed members of the forum, I leave you now to judge how seriously to take this cretin.
          Does he have a gun, or other weapon, and are they within striking distance of me?
          Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
          threadeds website, and here's my blog.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by sasguru
            Esteemed members of the forum, I leave you now to judge how seriously to take this cretin.
            Now on the fraud front sir? Did you see my macro on Generalised Estimating Equations for ordinal responses, which extended Liang and Zegers work back in the mid 90’s before SAS actually incorporated GEE into Genmod? Infact I would welcome your views on how one can trick Genmod to do ordinal repeated measures in a proportional odds fashion without recourse to IML?

            Comment


              #76
              [QUOTE=ArdescoIf you can't see it for what it is, you have already fallen for it.[/QUOTE]You see, that is the problem. I have been thinking like that for years and I mean years, before I even heard of the BNP.

              As I said, you are still failing to answer the bottom line question.
              IS IT UNREASONABLE TO PUT OUR OWN FIRST?

              BTW You will have to prove that the BNP is a racist organisation or you may find yourself in a spot of legal bovver. You see racism is illegal and to date the BNP is still a legal political party.....
              I am not qualified to give the above advice!

              The original point and click interface by
              Smith and Wesson.

              Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Ardesco
                The BNP is your classic propoganda machine. They deny racism on the surface but base all thier policies around it and use it to try and realise thier objectives. The fact that so many people these days seem to be blinkered into thinking the BNP is just saying what the average man on the street is thinking prooves just how good they have got at it.

                On the surface the rant looks reasonable but if you look at the undertones and focus on the way it is worded it looks like a peice of propoganda. It tries to push you to the authors point of view in a subtle way and would be the first in a serious of works that would become more and more outragous until you don't see a problem with outright racism and belive that all the foreign devils are behind all the woes of this country.

                If you can't see it for what it is, you have already fallen for it.
                Spot on. The BNP is effective at stirring up the fears of sections of the white population. But FFS, they are led by a man (Nick Griffin) who denies the holocaust ever took place and believes that there is an international Jewish conspiracy to control the world. I'd say that makes everything about the BNP highly suspect to say the least.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Old Greg
                  Spot on. The BNP is effective at stirring up the fears of sections of the white population. But FFS, they are led by a man (Nick Griffin) who denies the holocaust ever took place and believes that there is an international Jewish conspiracy to control the world. I'd say that makes everything about the BNP highly suspect to say the least.
                  And this isn't anti BNP propaganda because?.....

                  Answer the damn question. SHOULD BRITS BE SECOND BEST WHEN SOCIAL SECURITY IS BEING HANDED OUT?
                  I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                  The original point and click interface by
                  Smith and Wesson.

                  Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Ardesco
                    The BNP is your classic propoganda machine. They deny racism on the surface but base all thier policies around it and use it to try and realise thier objectives. The fact that so many people these days seem to be blinkered into thinking the BNP is just saying what the average man on the street is thinking prooves just how good they have got at it.

                    On the surface the rant looks reasonable but if you look at the undertones and focus on the way it is worded it looks like a peice of propoganda. It tries to push you to the authors point of view in a subtle way and would be the first in a serious of works that would become more and more outragous until you don't see a problem with outright racism and belive that all the foreign devils are behind all the woes of this country.

                    If you can't see it for what it is, you have already fallen for it.
                    This is the usual approach of the slow or dull witted. Who mentioned the BNP here, do you have anything constructive to say regarding my ideas, go on dive in the water's warm. You never know I may see the light. ??????

                    I assure you I will not shy away from saying how I feel the majority of the British public feel. It will be invariant as perhaps you will observe if I care to hang around such a place a while longer. That’s a conspiracy theory problem you have, I’d check under the bed for booooogey men if I were you.

                    I await just one comment in constructive opposition to one single thing I said in my original post.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
                      And this isn't anti BNP propaganda because?.....

                      Answer the damn question. SHOULD BRITS BE SECOND BEST WHEN SOCIAL SECURITY IS BEING HANDED OUT?
                      I already answered that in a previous post where I said that it is right that british people should get houses before immigrants no matter what thier race/colour/creed.

                      Have a read back gunny

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X