Originally posted by Paddy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Couldn’t happen to a nicer couple
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Unfortunately that is incorrect and the figure is at least 16.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymore -
He's also gone through the key points in a very, very long Twitter thread which includes screenshots from these very forums!Originally posted by eek View PostDan’s article is now up at https://www.taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/01...rrowman_fraud/ and it’s on Newsnight tonight at 22:30
Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
He's also gone through the key points in a very, very long Twitter thread which includes screenshots from these very forums!

Nice to know some people take these forums seriously...."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Glad to see come uppance coming to some of these firmsOriginally posted by SueEllen View Post

Nice to know some people take these forums seriously....Comment
-
Comment
-
To busy chasing individual contractors. Maybe we just don’t think big enough is our problem . . . .
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...droidApp_Other
Last edited by Keanu2020; 21 January 2024, 12:15.Comment
-
-
Good good. Baby steps. I'm a little worried any investigations/prosecutions are going to fail if HMRC are involved. They have a history of completely screwing up even the most straight forward case and this is far from straight forward but maybe a criminal investigation will do a better job.Originally posted by Andy2022 View Post
It's only looking and the PPE bit though, I'm still hoping all the work uncovering his loans carry ons will reach court as well but it's so complex. Once they get in to the details of his accounting it's going to be an utter minefield.
I would have thought, but then what do I know, he should be going cap in hand to everybody that is threatening to do him over, ask for a settlement which is likely to be way below what a full investigation would turn up, pay it quick and try put a lid on it all. But a) he's probably and arrogant sod and b) he's got so much money to throw at this he believes he can either win on make it too difficult to carry on.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Is it not more likely though, that neither of them will have any assets tied to them and easily freezable ?Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Good good. Baby steps. I'm a little worried any investigations/prosecutions are going to fail if HMRC are involved. They have a history of completely screwing up even the most straight forward case and this is far from straight forward but maybe a criminal investigation will do a better job.
It's only looking and the PPE bit though, I'm still hoping all the work uncovering his loans carry ons will reach court as well but it's so complex. Once they get in to the details of his accounting it's going to be an utter minefield.
I would have thought, but then what do I know, he should be going cap in hand to everybody that is threatening to do him over, ask for a settlement which is likely to be way below what a full investigation would turn up, pay it quick and try put a lid on it all. But a) he's probably and arrogant sod and b) he's got so much money to throw at this he believes he can either win on make it too difficult to carry on.
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....Comment
-
From https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...stigates-fraudOriginally posted by TestMangler View Post
Is it not more likely though, that neither of them will have any assets tied to them and easily freezable ?
The pair face an investigation by the National Crime Agency into alleged medical equipment fraud. The Financial Times reported that the frozen assets included a six-bedroom central London townhouse, a country estate on the Isle of Man, and 15 accounts with Coutts, C Hoare & Co and Goldman Sachs International.
Issued in December, the restraint order blocks Mone, a lingerie entrepreneur, and her husband, the financier Douglas Barrowman, from selling some of the assets and places restrictions on others.
Mone and Barrowman, who is based in the Isle of Man, agreed to the court order after an application by the Crown Prosecution Service under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
The court order was “a result of a consensual process during which negotiations took place with the CPS”, a spokesperson for Mone and Barrowman told the FT.
I thought the town house was for sale?Last edited by SueEllen; 26 January 2024, 12:45."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment