• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

We grab the moon because it is hard

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    JFK was a serial pederast.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
      Manned moon shots should be pretty much routine by now.

      Trump should setting his sights on a manned mission to Mars, before the Russkies get there!
      I think the Chinese will be there first
      "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Flashman View Post
        If your gonna waste money then better it be on space travel than windmills.
        Windmills aren't a waste, we've been using them for centuries if not longer. Space travel should be focused on something useful - if the moon is useful then let's do that. Maybe a moon hotel.

        Originally posted by Paddy View Post
        It's a bit like the invention of the laser. It had no use at first but later it has infinite uses.
        That's a pleasingly empty statement. Because lasers had no obvious applications but turned out to have lots, anything else that has no obvious applications should do too?

        Mars or asteroids seem more useful. The only benefit of the moon appears to be it's close by and easy to get to. Places where you can mine your resources after landing are the key.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Paddy View Post
          I think the Chinese will be there first
          Good for them

          The Soviets and the USA realised in the 70s there was bugger all up there, if they want to spend their money on flying dogs up to space rather than eating them well it might be a sign of progress.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Mars or asteroids seem more useful. The only benefit of the moon appears to be it's close by and easy to get to. Places where you can mine your resources after landing are the key.
            The Moon will be a very handy jumping off point for missions to Mars and asteroids.

            For a start, it has sizeable deposits of ice, which can be broken down by solar energy to Hydrogen and Oxygen.
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              Good for them

              The Soviets and the USA realised in the 70s there was bugger all up there, if they want to spend their money on frying dogs up to space rather than eating them well it might be a sign of progress.
              FTFY
              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                The Moon will be a very handy jumping off point for missions to Mars and asteroids.

                For a start, it has sizeable deposits of ice, which can be broken down by solar energy to Hydrogen and Oxygen.
                And as a staging post for missions to Mars it has less gravity than Earth, so less fuel is wasted (and needs to be carried) for getting to other asteroids/planets.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Earth orbit habitats and factories, colonise the asteroids. Forget Mars and the Moon. By getting major industry and a large number of people off earth, you can a) save the Earth b) save humanity should the Earth get wiped out by some major event.
                  Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    Earth orbit habitats and factories, colonise the asteroids. Forget Mars and the Moon. By getting major industry and a large number of people off earth, you can a) save the Earth b) save humanity should the Earth get wiped out by some major event.
                    If earth gets destroyed by an asteroid etc anything in direct orbit will have a rough time.

                    other than that I agree with you.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                      Hasn't the world decided a moon base isn't that useful since the environment is so hostile and there's not much there of use?
                      That won't stop anyone, we have people in Scotland for crying out loud!
                      "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

                      https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X