• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Crackdown on personal service companies could raise £400m in tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by MrO666 View Post
    However I would think that a large number of Tory voters will be affected by the changes to dividend taxes.
    Pretty much every one man band in the country. So the economy then.
    The dividend tax changes and ER changes are/would be short-sighted lunacy. But then that's the kind of thing we've come to expect.

    The fact that the majority of voters in general don't have the nous to run their own businesses doesn't make this OK even if it is a vote winner.
    I'm a smug bastard.

    Comment


      Originally posted by MrO666 View Post
      However I would think that a large number of Tory voters will be affected by the changes to dividend taxes.
      I assume you're talking in reference to investment shareholders here? How do the rules apply (well not that they're implemented yet) in that scenario? What's the allowance you get and how does it work when your shares are held in an ISA for instance?
      Originally posted by LucidDementia View Post
      Pretty much every one man band in the country. So the economy then.
      We all get how important you delude yourself you are, but one-man band Ltd companies are not the backbone of the economy.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        [QUOTE=d000hg;2173001]I assume you're talking in reference to investment shareholders here?



        Just in general to be honest, there will be a large number of people who receive some form of income via dividend, and who potentially may have not incurred tax on such but will now be in the net.

        Everything just seems so short sighted over the past couple of years. Clearly not looking at the future and how to improve the whole economy, and just looking on how to fix a very specific issue.

        I think the Chancellor has ended up with tunnel vision when it comes to the deficit, it's like nothing else matters. He's backed himself into this corner though by making promises he shouldn't have.

        Remember the old Top Gun line.......Your ego's writing cheques your body can't cash

        Comment


          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          We all get how important you delude yourself you are, but one-man band Ltd companies are not the backbone of the economy.
          You are a funny one.

          First of all when did I state I was a one-man-band? You no nothing about me other than a dislike of my opinions. I'm OK with that but stop making everything personal, it's lame.

          Secondly - backbone of the economy? No, but they're big part of it. All the local high streets are full of them; fast food shops, mom and pop computer shops, thrift stores, cafes, sandwich vans, pubs, vape shops, newsagents, petrol stations, McDonald's, Subway, tyre places, window fitters, locksmiths. The list is pretty much endless.

          One man bands are all around us and they matter. And it'll hit them all (or at least all those with Ltd companies). And the knock on effects will hit the big boys due to decreased spending power.
          Last edited by LucidDementia; 24 November 2015, 10:10.
          I'm a smug bastard.

          Comment


            Originally posted by LucidDementia View Post
            You are a funny one.

            All the local high streets are full of them; fast food shops, mom and pop computer shops, thrift stores, cafes, sandwich vans, pubs, vape shops, newsagents, petrol stations, McDonald's, Subway, tyre places, window fitters, locksmiths. The list is pretty much endless.

            One man bands are all around us and they matter. And it'll hit them all (or at least all those with Ltd companies). And the knock on effects will hit the big boys due to decreased spending power.
            Non of the above are one man band !!

            Comment


              Originally posted by SandyD View Post
              Non of the above are one man band !!
              I'm sorry, please clarify. Which "none of the above" cannot be one man bands?

              I can give you McDs and Subway franchises as they'd have to be pretty damn small; all semantics anyway as all can be and often are private Ltds, which mean they'll all get clobbered for divi tax.

              I can tell you I have personal friends and acquaintances who operate one man band Ltds in: Computer Shops, Mobile Phone Shops, Glazing, Locksmith, Butty Van and Classic Car Restoration and that's without trying.
              Last edited by LucidDementia; 24 November 2015, 10:44.
              I'm a smug bastard.

              Comment


                I think we're going slightly off topic here.

                I guess we'll need to wait until tomorrow and see what gifts Boy George has for us.

                Whilst I can accept a tweaking of the rules, I think anything quite as draconian as what's been suggested would be a hammer to crack a nut and would more than likely backfire........or hopefully get reworked before any implementation.

                I think it's fair to say that 1st, 2nd line, and more entry / admin type roles (in all industries) shouldn't be contracts anyway, that's clearly just an employer not wanting the FTE on the books. However when it comes to projects and other specialised roles, they should still be able to operate as before (albeit with a tweak in the rules).

                HOPEFULLY this is more or less what comes out of this. I really don't have an issue in a tightening of the reigns to ensure that the PSC (whatever that is ) isn't abused, but equally business need to step up and accept that BAU roles should be employees.

                That's just my opinion anyway.

                Comment


                  Multiple Clients

                  So all this doesn't apply if you invoice multiple clients. To me this seems like a likely candidate to work around this. If you can prove to whoever has the onus for making sure contractor passes test, that you invoice other clients, then that seems like a much more clearer criteria to meet than SDC. This is provided HMRC has the sense to properly define what that means of course. I suppose the criteria could be amount of time spent working for each client within a set amount of time. Typically my clients don't want to share my time as it would be too sensitive (Chinese walls and such), but if the industry is completely separate and time requirements are realistic, it could work for me. I'd happily do some low-paid work on rent-a-coder to maintain my status.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Ned View Post
                    So all this doesn't apply if you invoice multiple clients. To me this seems like the a likely candidate to work around this. If you can prove to whoever has the onus for making sure contractor passes test, that you invoice other clients, then that seems like a much more clearer criteria to meet than SDC. This is provided HMRC has the sense to properly define what that means of course. I suppose the criteria could be amount of time spent working for each client within a set amount of time. Typically my clients don't want to share my time as it would be too sensitive (Chinese walls and such), but if the industry is completely separate and time requirements are realistic, it could work for me. I'd happily do some low-paid work on rent-a-coder to maintain my status.
                    I think HMRC are going to have second guessed the rent-a-coder line and would look at time spent to debunk this strategy. Also remember if you are genuinely invoicing multiple clients it's currently possible to be inside IR35 on one contract and not the other as it's on a contract by contract basis. It did help with the now defunct BET's but doesn't really help in an investigation. I'm not convinced that multiple clients will be a gauranteed way out after the changes either.
                    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Ned View Post
                      So all this doesn't apply if you invoice multiple clients.
                      Nothing applies yet because the Autumn Statement is tomorrow, not yesterday. Nobody knows apart from Osborne really, and I would be surprised if he really understands.
                      I'm a smug bastard.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X