You can write "President and CEO" on your YourCo business card, it doesn't change the facts.
A Ltd is NOT the most sensible structure for a contractor, we use them because it's the most efficient way of working not because we want to start up a business. Contractors decide "I want to go contracting" not "I want to run a business".
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Petition to get the gov to reconsider the dividend tax changes
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostPaying both sides of NI doesn't really make sense either. We may legally be a company with one person but most of us aren't necessarily employees of our companies anyway and the fact is, a Ltd is just a convenience/necessity for contractors. A special 1-ban-band/PSC setup could make sense, since/provided one could transition to a regular Ltd easily if you end up being more of a 'proper' business. Or some sort of protection for sole traders so that agencies/clients are not scared of using them.
No, how about feck off, I run a proper legal limited liability company in the same way as anyone else. It is not a PSC or other such meaningless bulltulip. It is a VAT registered, tax paying business, that takes risk, performs services, submits invoices, hopes for payment, sends in the legals for non payment, just like every other business.
Go **** yourself with your bulltulip.
HTH BIDILeave a comment:
-
Paying both sides of NI doesn't really make sense either. We may legally be a company with one person but most of us aren't necessarily employees of our companies anyway and the fact is, a Ltd is just a convenience/necessity for contractors. A special 1-ban-band/PSC setup could make sense, since/provided one could transition to a regular Ltd easily if you end up being more of a 'proper' business. Or some sort of protection for sole traders so that agencies/clients are not scared of using them.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pr1 View Postnluk's implication was that it didn't matter because it wouldn't affect his lifestyle (i.e. not based on fair/unfair)Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pr1 View Post(I'm only playing devils advocate, I think we should all pay PAYE but no employers NI, which I think the div tax will align to in the near future)
If you're genuinely in business you should be free to act like a business which just happens to have one employee. Which means the employee pays the full amount of tax on what they actually earn, and the business is free to keep profits in the company to smooth out any future peaks and troughs. The worse thing about IR35 is that it taxes you on the company's income for that year whether you've personally earned it or not. They should sort that out, get rid of the reporting requirements of one man companies (and so saving us all money spent on accountants), and apply the expenses rules in a way that treats permies and contractors equally, and I'd think that would be fair to all.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou could say the same about income tax or personal allowance. Rejecting something that's fair because it might end up being unfair doesn't seem that sensible. At this rate, by the time they do what you suggest we'll all be in IR35 anyway.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pr1 View Postmaybe at 7.5%, what about at 10%? 12.5%? 15%? What about if the 5k free limit reduces to zero?Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI can't remember 100%, but pretty sure the box was whether the company was PSC.
For me the answer was no.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAbsolutely this. I can't remember too much that hasn't gone our way in recent budgets. Many other groups have been hit year on year. Something was going to happen eventually. Yes it narks me but isn't going to affect my lifeatyle. The other issues however.....
it's not going to happen, but the time to challenge it is now, not when it's been introduced and they start creeping it up 1 or 2% per year
(I'm only playing devils advocate, I think we should all pay PAYE but no employers NI, which I think the div tax will align to in the near future)
edit: I'm also not signing the petitionLast edited by pr1; 2 September 2015, 08:08.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ticktock View PostI avoided checking the box because it went on to say something about "and operated within IR35".
For me the answer was no.Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should I tailor my CV and risk agencies receiving several versions of my skills? Dec 13 18:54
- Contractor dividends guide for the 2022/23 tax year Today 09:58
- Contractor dividends refresher, now that the 2022/23 tax year is here Today 09:58
- 'Ridiculous' Future of Work review slammed as a case of here we go again Today 08:48
- IT contractor jobs market losing steam, despite historical growth holding up Yesterday 08:34
- 'Work From Home' debate among contractors rages on, but most remote workers aren't saving the planet May 17 09:33
- What Kaye Adams' IR35 ruling really means for IT contractors May 17 09:10
- Due to the Catch 22 of umbrella contractor holiday pay, the law is an ass May 16 10:00
- For contractors, here's an IR35 case law refresher (because even us lawyers can hardly keep up) May 13 10:45
- To the Director of Labour Market Enforcement, here's my message as a compliance expert May 12 08:37
Leave a comment: