November 22nd - The death of contracting as we know it
+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 ... LastLast
Posts 91 to 100 of 213
  1. #91

    Godlike

    jamesbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    5,748
    Thanks (Given)
    90
    Thanks (Received)
    439
    Likes (Given)
    650
    Likes (Received)
    1826

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    How much????
    Probably one or more of: being ripped off; in a high-risk industry; massive policy ceiling; or dealing with North American clients.

  2. #92
    PTP
    PTP is offline

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    294
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    7
    Likes (Given)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11

    Default

    Answer: In a high-risk industry

    or so that's what brollies and indemnity providers think.

    That's why brollies refuse to take on contractors in this industry.

  3. #93

    Super poster

    Fred Bloggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    4,922
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    91
    Likes (Given)
    127
    Likes (Received)
    318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PTP View Post
    Exactly. So if we've got to shell out £1,800/year for indemnity that they don't, why shouldn't we get an allowance for it?
    Simples. When you are an employee you do not need any liability insurances. What's more, the insurance company won't cover you nor will it pay out on a claim anyway. The insurance is for a business, not an employee. Employers have the insurance, you are entitled to see it and by law it must be posted in a place where staff can read it anyway. Though, I guess not all employers comply.
    Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
    Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

  4. #94

    More time posting than coding


    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    250
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Given)
    75
    Likes (Received)
    18

    Default

    Surely there needs to be a contractor group mounting a legal challenge to this? IR35 cases have gone to court and HMRC have consistently lost over the years. What has changed from a legal perspective between then and now? Nothing as far as I am aware. If we were outside then, we are outside now. Why are we leaving it to the doctors (another post on this thread) to mount this challenge, what is the plan of IT contractors beyond a pub conversation on threads like this?

  5. #95
    eek
    eek is offline

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks (Given)
    271
    Thanks (Received)
    1297
    Likes (Given)
    1085
    Likes (Received)
    3765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theroyale View Post
    Surely there needs to be a contractor group mounting a legal challenge to this? IR35 cases have gone to court and HMRC have consistently lost over the years. What has changed from a legal perspective between then and now? Nothing as far as I am aware. If we were outside then, we are outside now. Why are we leaving it to the doctors (another post on this thread) to mount this challenge, what is the plan of IT contractors beyond a pub conversation on threads like this?
    What has changed is that HMRC has got far cleverer. The public sector ir35 changes left very few angles to attack heck read the history on here and you can see how any possibilities were easily shot down.

    There is probably a judicial review being requested by locum doctors. That isnít actually aimed at HMRC but rather at the nhs where nhs improvement stated everyone must be inside, then publicly changed that statement but seemingly kept the private advice the same. So they are attacking that not the principle itself.
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  6. #96

    TPAFKAk2p2

    mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Null island
    Posts
    25,112
    Thanks (Given)
    862
    Thanks (Received)
    1471
    Likes (Given)
    6477
    Likes (Received)
    5179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theroyale View Post
    Surely there needs to be a contractor group mounting a legal challenge to this? IR35 cases have gone to court and HMRC have consistently lost over the years. What has changed from a legal perspective between then and now? Nothing as far as I am aware. If we were outside then, we are outside now. Why are we leaving it to the doctors (another post on this thread) to mount this challenge, what is the plan of IT contractors beyond a pub conversation on threads like this?
    Contractor groups have repeatedly asked for people who believe they have a strong case to challenge the PS body's decision to come forward. People don't want to stick their head above the parapet. If anyone knows an IPSE member who believes they have such a case, and is prepared to fight it then they should contact policy@ipse.co.uk.

  7. #97

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    34,978
    Thanks (Given)
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    1596
    Likes (Given)
    1882
    Likes (Received)
    6449

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    Contractor groups have repeatedly asked for people who believe they have a strong case to challenge the PS body's decision to come forward. People don't want to stick their head above the parapet. If anyone knows an IPSE member who believes they have such a case, and is prepared to fight it then they should contact policy@ipse.co.uk.
    Tough call that one though. I spoke to IPSE about my last PS gig which a blanket job. I got in trouble just for raising it with my client so IPSE supporting me to take it legal wasn't going to work. IPSE didn't do anything wrong, it's just a very big ask to go that far that they can help. Fighting a case against an ex client while you're benched didn't seem that attractive.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  8. #98
    eek
    eek is offline

    bored now

    eek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    😂
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks (Given)
    271
    Thanks (Received)
    1297
    Likes (Given)
    1085
    Likes (Received)
    3765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Tough call that one though. I spoke to IPSE about my last PS gig which a blanket job. I got in trouble just for raising it with my client so IPSE supporting me to take it legal wasn't going to work. IPSE didn't do anything wrong, it's just a very big ask to go that far that they can help. Fighting a case against an ex client while you're benched didn't seem that attractive.
    +1. Assuming you are not incredibly specialised chances are a contractor is substitutable. Hence trouble makers can be easily substituted with another contractor and moved to the bench...

    As I stated earlier there is a reason why fighting these changes is far harder than previous ones...
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

  9. #99
    pr1
    pr1 is offline

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks (Given)
    4
    Thanks (Received)
    57
    Likes (Given)
    17
    Likes (Received)
    240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eek View Post
    +1. Assuming you are not incredibly specialised chances are a contractor is substitutable. Hence trouble makers can be easily substituted with another contractor and moved to the bench...

    As I stated earlier there is a reason why fighting these changes is far harder than previous ones...
    fun fact, 15 of your last 20 posts end with ellipses...

  10. #100

    TPAFKAk2p2

    mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Null island
    Posts
    25,112
    Thanks (Given)
    862
    Thanks (Received)
    1471
    Likes (Given)
    6477
    Likes (Received)
    5179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Tough call that one though. I spoke to IPSE about my last PS gig which a blanket job. I got in trouble just for raising it with my client so IPSE supporting me to take it legal wasn't going to work. IPSE didn't do anything wrong, it's just a very big ask to go that far that they can help. Fighting a case against an ex client while you're benched didn't seem that attractive.
    You're right, and it wasn't intended as a criticism. But that's why it's not so easy to mount a legal challenge - people who are prepared to go through that need to come forward.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 20 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.