Has anyone worked at this client site before?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
nPower Worcester: Oak House
Collapse
X
-
nPower Worcester: Oak House
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
-
Value add as ever NL!Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNope. HTH
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
I can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostValue add as ever NL!'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Probably. I'd even go as far as to say "yes, someone has worked at that site before".Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostHas anyone worked at this client site before?
I'm not one of them, though.
HTH.Comment
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostHas anyone worked at this client site before?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNope. HTH
No it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI can honestly say, unlike the content of many of my previous 12.5k posts, that my statement is factually 100% correct and did not have to resort to pasting random stuff of Google.
HTH.Comment
-
LOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OPOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostNo it isn't. It isn't 1% factually correct. The question was whether anyone has worked at the site, and you answered "Nope". That isn't correct. The fact that you haven't worked there doesn't mean that no-one has.
HTH.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
so surely you answer should have been.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostLOL good point. I did think about putting 'yes someone has' but thought that would be unhelpful to the OP
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
It should have been... but my command of good English is not up to your standard so it wouldn't have looked quite as polished as that response.Originally posted by eek View Postso surely you answer should have been.
Yes, someone clearly has. I, however, have not so cannot help.
That's true for me as well, I don't work in County Bumpkinville.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Thanks for those responses.
I won't abuse you as we're not in General, but, you know what I'd call you if we were.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment