• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Contractor to perm - how much money to expect (part timer)

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BABABlackSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    Saw this on a job ad, which I suspect to be for lloyds.


    "This is a permanent role with the salary range of £60k to £70k per annum plus benefits. If you are interested in contract, the max rate is £400 p/d until the end of March then the role will be classified as inside IR35."


    Just one case but kind of gives you an idea of the companies' point of view of day rate/salary equivalence.
    That’s not Lloyds. They have a blanket policy of the end date being the 28th Feb working through a PSC.

    I agree. Outside London £400 a day roughly equates to 60k + benefits, although, there’s a lot of people on £400 a day who wouldn’t get a £60k Role as they tend to be senior.

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Saw this on a job ad, which I suspect to be for lloyds.


    "This is a permanent role with the salary range of £60k to £70k per annum plus benefits. If you are interested in contract, the max rate is £400 p/d until the end of March then the role will be classified as inside IR35."


    Just one case but kind of gives you an idea of the companies' point of view of day rate/salary equivalence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Surrey Contractor
    replied
    Originally posted by ciaozio View Post
    I am on 650, and I asked for 110k, while their offer was 90k. Didn't go well for anyone.
    I had the same situation. Was on £550, offered perm, asked for £90k, they came back with £75k+10% bonus = £82K, pretty much said take it or leave it, I accepted, said they'd wait until 6 months was past to avoid paying agency fees. They then delayed the offer keeping me on a contract, then started suddenly finding spurious attitude problems, three months later I was gone.

    Didn't go well at all! But no regrets

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    If money is your priority why are you even considering perm?

    Leave a comment:


  • smatty
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    60k VS 38k in govt....

    At these salaries, why would anyone ever want to work in govt?
    Well some govt orgs give opportunities to get involved in stuff that private sector cannot, there's more motivations than just money

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Contractor to perm - how much money to expect (part timer)

    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    So, kids, the lesson here is: public sector jobs make you sour and grumpy like gables.
    Being a permie makes you grumpy. Even more so in public sector as you’ve got to retire to make it worthwhile.
    Last edited by Lance; 25 November 2019, 17:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • gables
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    So, kids, the lesson here is: public sector jobs make you sour and grumpy like gables.
    Absolutely not, neither sour nor grumpy, happy as I am switching between private and public sector contracts.

    Maybe you just didn't like the reality of the truth.
    Last edited by gables; 25 November 2019, 17:26.

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Originally posted by gables View Post
    Well because 38K isn't the top of non-management, around these parts it's a smidge under 50K. Also I don't believe 60K jobs are ten a penny, not around here maybe London, and certainly won't have the same working conditions.



    The arrogance is palpable, suggests everyone in private sector is not tulipe, which from experience is not the case.



    You ruined this with your arrogance. But I'd suggest the smart money would be on a 50K role with it's pension and working conditions rather than 60K private with it's undoubtedly tulipe pension.
    So, kids, the lesson here is: public sector jobs make you sour and grumpy like gables.

    Leave a comment:


  • gables
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    60k VS 38k in govt....

    At these salaries, why would anyone ever want to work in govt?
    Well because 38K isn't the top of non-management, around these parts it's a smidge under 50K. Also I don't believe 60K jobs are ten a penny, not around here maybe London, and certainly won't have the same working conditions.

    Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
    Because they are tulipe and can’t get job in private sector
    The arrogance is palpable, suggests everyone in private sector is not tulipe, which from experience is not the case.

    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    Probably yes.

    Also they lure you in with chunky pensions and other benefits such as wfh and flexi time, plus obviously the fact that you'll be paid to do feck all.
    You ruined this with your arrogance. But I'd suggest the smart money would be on a 50K role with it's pension and working conditions rather than 60K private with it's undoubtedly tulipe pension.

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Originally posted by GhostofTarbera View Post
    Because they are tulipe and can’t get job in private sector
    Probably yes.

    Also they lure you in with chunky pensions and other benefits such as wfh and flexi time, plus obviously the fact that you'll be paid to do feck all.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X