Originally posted by SussexSeagull
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contractor Interviews and Testing?
Collapse
X
-
Having been on the hiring side, I have to admit having been hoodwinked by impressive seeming people who could talk the talk, but when I sat them in front of a computer it became clear they had no idea what they we're doing.Leave a comment:
-
I am of the opinion that if an interviewer can't tell the difference between someone who knows the job and a faker in an interview they shouldn't be doing interviews. With testing I often encounter scenario based questions which are more than challenging enough done properly.
That said I will do a test if it is brief. Whatever you do don't do anything that can be used in the real world.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostIf you claim you can do xyz, it's in my opinion ok for clients to ask to prove it. As a contractor you're a business and many businesses are asked to prove something before they get the order. See it like a pilot.
As in the other threads about this subject, just watch out that they don't use it as free consultancy. It should clearly be a test and not a prototype of something you will have to design or develop.
It's rare, but occasionally does happen.
+
Test can be good and bad depending on what you're being interviewed for. Bad in that it's a good way for an employer to get out of having any interviewing skills ( eg. are you sure the employer knows what they're talking about to start with and here they are asking you questions ?)Leave a comment:
-
I've seen two types of tests: good ones and bad ones.
Good ones involved sitting down with an exercise that reasonably reflects the type of work I'd expect to do. Usually quite fun to do as an exercise.
Bad ones come in the form of some lazy instructions and/or irrelevant computer science related algorithms that I usually don't understand and never bother doing.
The tests are to help the client know a bit about how you work and - importantly - for you to get a sense of how the client works. If the test is nonsense, the work will be nonsense - walk away!. If the test is interesting and followed up by a discussion about implementation, scalability, etc, that's useful.
I don't think that anything created in a test has any commercial value, so I wouldn't worry about that.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostIf you claim you can do xyz, it's in my opinion ok for clients to ask to prove it. As a contractor you're a business and many businesses are asked to prove something before they get the order. See it like a pilot.
As in the other threads about this subject, just watch out that they don't use it as free consultancy. It should clearly be a test and not a prototype of something you will have to design or develop.Leave a comment:
-
If you claim you can do xyz, it's in my opinion ok for clients to ask to prove it. As a contractor you're a business and many businesses are asked to prove something before they get the order. See it like a pilot.
As in the other threads about this subject, just watch out that they don't use it as free consultancy. It should clearly be a test and not a prototype of something you will have to design or develop.Leave a comment:
-
We've had numerous threads on this. Always a good idea to try searching the forums using the Google search method mentioned in the Welcome FAQ section.
Play around with the search terms but here you go for starters.
interview test site:forums.contractoruk.com - Google SearchLeave a comment:
-
Contractor Interviews and Testing?
Any thoughts on this guys. While permanent, I used to sit thought technical tests (online and offline) 3-4 screenings with various people etc. Unfortunately, I think, the IT industry is probably one of those that is easily testable so everybody does it. In contracting I am finding that clients/agencies are continuing this pattern. It takes time, specifically time unpaid for. I personally do not like it because If I am operating as a business I can give you guarantees but I don't think it is reasonable to test. I do not test Amazon every time I purchase from there, also there is no way or opportunity for me to test the agency/client neither.
Interested to know what people generally think about this and how to mitigate such practices. Do you think this is acceptable or not?
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: