• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Isn't it time to let this go?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • darmstadt
    replied
    The UK are paying nearly 3 times the price per dose from AZ than the EU as they insisted on a clause in the contract that they would get all their doses to the detriment of everyone else. This is why Johnson cites 'national security' over the contents of the UK-AZ contract

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View Post
    Do you concede that the way the UK handled vaccine procurement was more probable due to brexit?

    Declaring it a benefit of brexit is a bit silly, as brexiteers didn't know about covid in 2016, however it sure will invigorate the narrative that the EU is an ineffective bureaucracy.
    Well if all countries had done what Britain has done there would have been multiple acrimonious battles between different EU countries as they all scrambled for first "dibbs". The Brexiteers would then have pointed to this as a failure of the EU.

    The fact is that the disadvantages of a combined bureacracy still outweighs the disadvantages of 27 countries scrapping with each other.

    If Astra-Zeneca had been upfront about the UK having precedence then the EU could have ramped up orders with Pfizer, rather than learning about this without notice 6 months after ordering the vaccines. The UK manufacturing sites were listed in the contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Yes but it was under EU law, so it's completely ridiculous to suggest this was possible because of Brexit.

    The fact that this is trumpeted as the main benefit of Brexit demonstrates the futility Brexit.
    Do you concede that the way the UK handled vaccine procurement was more probable due to brexit?

    Declaring it a benefit of brexit is a bit silly, as brexiteers didn't know about covid in 2016, however it sure will invigorate the narrative that the EU is an ineffective bureaucracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Liz Truss on LBC sounds uncomfortable justifying businesses going under because of red tape caused by Brexit.
    Last edited by BlasterBates; 31 January 2021, 10:55.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post
    The UK left the EU in Jan 2020
    Yes but it was under EU law, so it's completely ridiculous to suggest this was possible because of Brexit.

    The fact that this is trumpeted as the main benefit of Brexit demonstrates the futility Brexit.
    Last edited by BlasterBates; 31 January 2021, 10:55.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    And I forgot to include Covid and vaccinations!

    I like Brexit too!!

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    But it's been less than a month.

    During a pandemic when people can't travel.

    And in January when people are paying off Christmas and haven't yet bought anything from Europe, and if they have are wondering why their packages are still stuck at the post office but haven't got around to finding out why...

    Brexit: - I was asked to pay an extra GBP82 for my GBP200 coat - BBC News

    No, there's much more entertainment to be had here.
    And I forgot to include Covid and vaccinations!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Now you're talking bollox and babbling on like the Daily Mail...

    You may find this interesting...

    Nice deflection and personal insult! The intellect of a slug.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View Post
    Could have? Historical options don't matter, here we are, this is what happened.

    And it's dishonest to say it was completely optional, the EU taking over procurement wasn't gentle, hence Germany being absolutely livid.

    Time to take the blinkers off, the EU will be better for it.
    Now you're talking bollox and babbling on like the Daily Mail...

    You may find this interesting...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheGreenBastard
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The EU, procurement process was voluntary however, all 27 countries signed up to it. Any EU country could have chosen to go-it-alone. We are too close to Europe to rely on just the UK to be properly vaccinated. The whole of Europe needs to be vaccinated to the maximum before lockdown can fully be dispensed with.
    Could have? Historical options don't matter, here we are, this is what happened.

    And it's dishonest to say it was completely optional, the EU taking over procurement wasn't gentle, hence Germany being absolutely livid.

    Time to take the blinkers off, the EU will be better for it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X