• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Blue Passports are finally here! Huzzah!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Such as?
    Normal lightbulbs, powerful vacuum cleaners and hair-dryers, there was talk about banning petrol lawn-mowers, but I believe that's still pending. I'm sure there's plenty more (kettles and toasters etc) but it's nearly pub o'clock...

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Well that's the thing if you could target and encourage farmers in the UK to be more efficient and perhaps to target different types of farming etc you could make it more profitable.

    So you're saying that the UK assigned the funds to the wrong British farmers?

    There's 2 pillars to CAP - the BPS and Rural Development. Both are overseen by DEFRA. In countries like Germany, the rural development side takes <5% of the budget. The UK government takes 15%. Yes, over 3x the amount that other countries take.
    Then each government decides on their own rules as to how they are going to allocate out the funds. It's called a direct payment, but it all goes through HM Gov.

    Don't you understand how the process worked?

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    So. About these blue passports....
    The blue passports are great. Again, an open Britain had them made in France or Poland, doesn't matter. Just shows how open we are.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    Maybe if UK farmers contributed more to the economy, they'd have got more in subsidies.
    Well that's the thing if you could target and encourage farmers in the UK to be more efficient and perhaps to target different types of farming etc you could make it more profitable. As it is we just finance the French farmers and those with the bigger farms win.

    I appreciate you validating my argument.
    Last edited by woohoo; 6 March 2020, 17:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    So. About these blue passports....

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    French farmers receive a bigger subsidy than UK counterparts so they cant compete on a level playing field. The entire policy is mainly for the benefit of French farmers. You must be trolling to ask this question?
    No, no, he's very intelligent, very successful and very rich. I think he may have mentioned this

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    French farmers receive a bigger subsidy than UK counterparts so they cant compete on a level playing field. The entire policy is mainly for the benefit of French farmers. You must be trolling to ask this question?

    Kinda depends how you look at it. It's like £350m versus 2.4% of government spend. One makes great marketing spin, the other puts it into perspective.

    UK farmers used to get €28b per year. UK farming contributes about 0.6% to the UK economy.
    French farmers receive about €63b per year. They contribute around 1.8% to the French economy.

    So, they contribute 3x as much to the economy, but receive just over 2x as much in subsidies.
    Maybe if UK farmers contributed more to the economy, they'd have got more in subsidies.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Name a couple of regs that our farmers could have changed to help them, that currently hinders them but not the French. And don't just quote "CAP", actually explain what the impact is on our farmers compared to the French.
    French farmers receive a bigger subsidy than UK counterparts so they cant compete on a level playing field. The entire policy is mainly for the benefit of French farmers. You must be trolling to ask this question?

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    That's down to individual companies to comply, and only on those products which they sell to the EU. We can un-ban everything the EU banned, for the UK market, if if we choose to do so. That's the difference.
    What do you think we should un-ban; that the EU has banned and we think is better not banned? Don't just talk abstract, let's get into the specifics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Yep if your company sells into the EU. If it doesn't then you don't need to do that. It's the same when selling to any other country.

    I imagine the UK could also if it wanted to implement policies and regulations that could encourage our farmers and not EU regs/laws aimed at French farmers. Guess that applies to fishing also. It's like you don't have to implement a ton of regulation that aims to cover a whole bunch of countries.
    Name a couple of regs that our farmers could have changed to help them, that currently hinders them but not the French. And don't just quote "CAP", actually explain what the impact is on our farmers compared to the French.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X