• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BBC executives fall foul of IR35

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Don't know the scenario Brillo - any linkys?
    I think he means like Moira Stuart? Jeremy Paxman and others have also been mentioned.

    or do you mean the stars that are investing in films that is being investigated?

    Investment or tax dodge? Celebrities face huge bills over film industry tax loophole | Mail Online
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      I think he means like Moira Stuart? Jeremy Paxman and others have also been mentioned.

      or do you mean the stars that are investing in films that is being investigated?

      Investment or tax dodge? Celebrities face huge bills over film industry tax loophole | Mail Online
      Well the Moira Stuart scenario would appear to cover earnings from personal appearances or talks (only £22k for the year) and if she is able to determine where and to whom she speaks I can't see any problem with running a Ltd Company outside IR35; it's not as if the earnings from her employment were put through the company (unless she is really badly paid!)

      The second scenario appears to be a case of HMR&C changing their mind and the investors not having a crystal ball - a worryingly common trend.
      Connect with me on LinkedIn

      Follow us on Twitter.

      ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
        It's still not fair though Cojak - collective responsibility to clear the national debt means that 100% should be paying their fair share otherwise there won't be enough cash to support those who make no contribution whatsoever to the states' coffers - it's only fair after all
        I hope this is tongue in cheek?

        As if these few make any bit of difference to the national debt! The huge amount of borrowing is what adds to the debt, a few millionaires wont make the slightest difference whether they pay 0% tax or 50%.

        Large Corps paying nothing make a difference but not as much as huge public sector borrowing just adding more and more...

        Classic Santelli Rant on the Buffett Rule | ZeroHedge
        Anti-bedwetting advice

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Notascooby View Post
          I hope this is tongue in cheek?
          Yes it was.
          "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
          - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by cojak View Post
            Yes it was.
            Monday afternoon and the heating in the office is tooooo high. I need a nap.
            Anti-bedwetting advice

            Comment

            Working...
            X