Hi,
I have been speaking with the Woolwich about getting a mortgage. They seemed quite optimistic, even though I have only been contracting for a few weeks. They said that they treat IT contractors differently to other contractors and that because I have well over 10 years in the industry I would likely be OK.
However, I hit a bit of a brick wall with them tonight, when I pointed out that I would be structured under a Limited Company. They said that would mean that I would need a year's accounts (if I was a customer) and two years (if I wasn't).
I was originally surprised when they said that things should be OK, and then even more surprised when they said that I wouldn't.
The contract, which is for 12 months, is in my name, and I actually haven't set up the company yet and so obviously haven't billed the client yet.
I know that there is obviously a difference between me and the legal entity of a company, but for practical purposes, I believe that I could just get the client to pay me via PAYE (which I think they would be happy to do), or do the same via an umbrella company.
That, it would seem, would be enough to move me back into the Woolwich's good books. The "self-employed" aspect seems to be the problem, although it seems a little strange given that the contract would be exactly the same.
I will call them again tomorrow, and I will post back here, but I just wondered if anybody had any thoughts on this. Am I missing anything with the idea that I could just work on the contract under a different structure?
Many Thanks,
Marshall
I have been speaking with the Woolwich about getting a mortgage. They seemed quite optimistic, even though I have only been contracting for a few weeks. They said that they treat IT contractors differently to other contractors and that because I have well over 10 years in the industry I would likely be OK.
However, I hit a bit of a brick wall with them tonight, when I pointed out that I would be structured under a Limited Company. They said that would mean that I would need a year's accounts (if I was a customer) and two years (if I wasn't).
I was originally surprised when they said that things should be OK, and then even more surprised when they said that I wouldn't.
The contract, which is for 12 months, is in my name, and I actually haven't set up the company yet and so obviously haven't billed the client yet.
I know that there is obviously a difference between me and the legal entity of a company, but for practical purposes, I believe that I could just get the client to pay me via PAYE (which I think they would be happy to do), or do the same via an umbrella company.
That, it would seem, would be enough to move me back into the Woolwich's good books. The "self-employed" aspect seems to be the problem, although it seems a little strange given that the contract would be exactly the same.
I will call them again tomorrow, and I will post back here, but I just wondered if anybody had any thoughts on this. Am I missing anything with the idea that I could just work on the contract under a different structure?
Many Thanks,
Marshall

Comment