- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
[Tax Planning][17/18] Company structure - spouse
Collapse
X
-
Mine cleans the study, but she charges £40 per hour because she does it in the buff -
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIt appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.
Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?Leave a comment:
-
I think WiB has pretty much nailed it there, I would do that too.
Happy 10^3 post too, WiB!Leave a comment:
-
The standard advice for some time has been that alphabet shares can be risky (as per TCP's post above) as being aggressive tax avoidance. Since they now have the right to pursue you for tax avoidance (within the law as written) that they interpret as violating the intent of the law, I would say the risk of alphabet shares is higher than it used to be. The advice historically has been that there should be a legitimate business reason for alphabet shares. The reason given in this thread is not a business reason but a personal tax planning one. I'd hesitate to do it if I were the OP, for those reasons.
I'll also add that it is my understanding that HMRC has full access to details of the shareholdings of limited companies. It seems likely that they would at some point start looking at companies with one A share and one B share, owned by spouses. I'd just avoid it, personally.
(Disclaimer: MyCo has alphabet shares, but MyCo is not the standard one man band, and the business reason is to provide a form of profit sharing to employees without risking control of the company.)
If I were the OP, I would not pay a salary to spouse, since that would put her into higher rate tax. I would want to structure shares such that my spouse could receive £5K dividends tax free, and that I could approximately maximise my income under the higher rate band.
I would pay myself £8K salary. That would leave £37K available for dividends (presumably that £37K will increase towards £40K or higher in the next few years) without going into the higher rate band. So the target dividends would be £5K for spouse and £37K for myself. I would use an 8-1 split, 8 shares for myself, 1 share for spouse.
This year, I would pay £4.6K per share in dividends -- £36.8K to me, £4.6K to spouse. As the threshold increases in future years, I would increase the per share dividend, keeping myself within the basic rate band. Once the per share dividend reached £5K, if I still had room within the higher rate band, I would increase the salary instead (which would incur NI liabilities but save on Corporation Tax, so almost a wash).
If your spouse ever quits her job, you could restructure, everything changes. You probably don't want to change your share structure frequently (that also could look suspicious to HMRC), but it certainly makes sense to review it every 4-5 years.
Edit: Just noticed this is my 1000th post. Incredible. I need to get a life.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIt appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.
Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIt appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.
Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?
Would be interesting to see if HMRC pursued a similar argument to the one they did with waivers though. In this case they argued that whilst the underlying gift of shares was not caught due to the spouse exemption, the waivers themselves constituted a separate arrangement in itself and one that was solely a gift of income so therefore a settlement and one that was not covered by the exemption.
It's not a huge leap of logic for them to argue that declaring dividends on a particular class of shares to take advantage of a spouse's tax allowances could constitute a settlement of income in its own right.
Of course this brings us back to the thing I always raise when settlements are brought up on here - do HMRC have the time, manpower and will to dig out the settlements legislation again and potentially start another Arctic? Maybe not, although if the use of alphabet shares to take advantage of the dividend allowance becomes more and more prevalent (as you say this advice seems to be becoming more common) then who knows...Leave a comment:
-
It appears alphabet shares are being more and more recommended when the general consensus was to avoid them. Using them just to give 5k tax free divis seems pretty aggressive tax avoidance on the face of it.
Is alphabet shares now the standard advice whatever the wife's situation and if so how long before HMRC come down on us like a ton of bricks to counter it?Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostYou don't have to but it's definitely beneficial for your spouse to be a company officer if she's also a shareholder so she can be eligible for ER in the future.
Mine is currently CS though I'm planning to make her a director. I'm not sure there's any real reason to choose one over the other.
They can still be taken to court for injuries during a match, but from what I've read their liability is more about not raising alarms to the right people.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by atanas View PostHello,
I am planning to incorporate a LTD next month and I need an advice on the company structure:
That's the plan:
Director[50% shares]:- Profile: Senior Automation QA
- Desired daily rate: ~ £350-£500
- Target anual income: ~ £90,000 - £100,000
- Director salary: £8,150
Secretary[50% shares]:- Anual income:
* ~ £32,000 permanent employment outside the LTD
* £8,150 secretary salary
- Does this company structure make sense considering that my wife is a permie and gets salary just below the basic rate? Will there be tax advantage if I include her as an employee?
- Shall I reduce her shares to 35%?
Thanks all
Paying your wife a salary would mean that it would all be taxed at 20% (income tax), but yes you will get the corporation tax relief on the salary of 20% also, but the tax efficient way will be with an alphabet share structure. 1 ordinary A for yourself and 1 ordinary B for your wife. Any dividends from £32k to £43k this year or £45k for 2017/18 will be taxed at 7.5%. Any dividends into the higher rate tax threshold will be taxed at 32.5%.
Bear in mind though that if this is all in place for the 2016/17 tax year, £5,000 of dividends can be taken tax free regardless of employment income, so would recommend utilising this if possible.
I hope this helps.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostAm I right in thinking you don't have to appoint a company secretary any more? Or, is this secretary role quite literally that, and not an official role?
Mine is currently CS though I'm planning to make her a director. I'm not sure there's any real reason to choose one over the other.Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: