Originally posted by PerfectStorm
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Do I really pay less tax as a limited company
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Forbes Young View PostYes your company pays CT @ 20% on its profits. However, you only pay income tax on dividend income once your total gross income exceeds £41,865 in the current tax year. If this is exceeded then you will pay income tax @ 25% on the net excess. No national insurance (Employees or employers) is ever paid on dividend income either of course, so still far more tax effective to operate through your own ltd company outside of IR35 and take a small salary of £663 per month (where no PAYE/NI is payable), take allowable expenses such as business mileage and dividends.
btw what do you mean by net excess? The amount of my salary over £41,865?Comment
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostKerching!
I could in essence work for 4 months and not work the next 8 and that would be really tax efficent as I would hit around 40k.
This is my 1st contract though and its hard to only take that 3k out a month and see all that money sitting there. I think I will still £663 a month into a pension and look at giving a good percentage to charity (although it seems complicated given the answers to my other question on this matter.)Comment
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostPlus the ability to build up a warchest and only pay higher rate income tax if you *need* to, whereas you have no choice if you are self-employed and earn over the threshold, which IMO is probably one of the biggest advantages overall.
how big should you let your warchest get before you dissolve it ( or diversify it by purchasing company assets/property )in a tax efficient manner?Comment
-
Originally posted by ItRYmyBEst View Posthow big should you let your warchest get before you dissolve it ( or diversify it by purchasing company assets/property )in a tax efficient manner?
I prefer to think of my war chest in terms of the number of months it would sustain regular quarterly dividend payments to my wife and I (she has a 25% share) up to the higher rate threshold should I stop earning.
I prefer to have at least 12 months and certainly no less than 6 months. The more the better to be honest, it depends how regular your work is and how much income you need to live (we can live comfortably on salary and dividends up to the higher rate but you may not).
I'd always take dividends up to the higher rate threshold regardless of how much retained profit that leaves me as you cant ever carry that basic rate band forward, even if I needed less to live on. Stick the rest in personal savings, your war chest doesn't have to exist solely in your business profits.Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 7 December 2014, 19:08.Comment
-
Originally posted by ItRYmyBEst View PostThanks I get it know All the answers are really good on my question
btw what do you mean by net excess? The amount of my salary over £41,865?Comment
-
Yes!
One on left is salary to £10k and then dividends, one on the right is salary only. The difference is much larger than I'd realised.Last edited by CanadianExpat; 9 December 2014, 22:42.Comment
-
Originally posted by CanadianExpat View PostYes!
Comment
-
Originally posted by CanadianExpat View PostNot my creation, I should add. I found it in an accounting book and thought it was so brilliant that I got the supporting data from the author.
If it weren't significantly better to operate through their own ltd company, then few contractors would choose to do so and instead go through an Umbrella or seek permanent employment.Comment
-
Originally posted by Forbes Young View PostIf it weren't significantly better to operate through their own ltd company, then few contractors would choose to do so and instead go through an Umbrella or seek permanent employment.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment